期刊文献+

替考拉宁与万古霉素治疗革兰阳性菌感染的临床研究 被引量:28

Clinical effects of teicoplanin and vancomycin on treatment of gram-positive bacteria infections
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的通过观察革兰阳性菌感染患者经替考拉宁和万古霉素治疗后的临床疗效、细菌清除率及安全性,为临床抗感染治疗提供参考。方法选取2013年6月-2017年9月在医院ICU住院期间应用替考拉宁或万古霉素治疗的革兰阳性菌感染患者129例为研究对象,根据治疗用药不同将患者分为替考拉宁组和万古霉素组,其中替考拉宁治疗67例,万古霉素治疗62例,治疗结束后观察两组患者临床疗效、细菌清除率及不良反应等情况。结果 129例入选患者中,肺部感染患者41例,泌尿系感染患者38例,血源性感染患者38例,其他感染患者12例;两组患者感染类型比较差异无统计学意义;治疗总有效率方面,替考拉宁组为83.58%,万古霉素组为74.19%,两组比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);细菌总清除率方面,替考拉宁组为83.58%,万古霉素组为77.42%,两组比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);不良反应发生率方面,替考拉宁组为4.47%低于万古霉素组(P<0.05);在检出病原菌中,金黄色葡萄球菌最多,其次为屎肠球菌。结论替考拉宁及万古霉素治疗革兰阳性菌感染均有较好的疗效,但替考拉宁的安全性要优于万古霉素。 OBJECTIVE To observe the clinical effects of teicoplanin and vancomycin on treatment of patients with gram-positive bacteria infections and analyze the bacterial clearance rates and safety so as to provide guidance for clinical treatment of the infections.METHODS From Jun 2013 to Sep 2017,a total of 129 patients with gram-positive bacteria infections who were treated with teicoplanin or vancomycin during the ICU stay were recruited as the study objects and divided into the teicoplanin group with 67 cases and the vancomycin group with 62 cases according to the use of antibiotics.The clinical curative effects,bacterial clearance rates and adverse reactions were observed and compared between the two groups of patients.RESULTS Of the 129 enrolled patients,41 had pulmonary infections,38 had urinary tract infections,38 had hematogenous infections and 12 had other sites of infections;there were no significant differences in the types of infections between the two groups of patients.The total effective rate of treatment was 83.58%in the teicoplanin group,74.19%in the vancomycin group,and there was no significant difference between the two groups(P 0.05).The total bacterial clearance rate was 83.58% in the teicoplanin group,77.42% in the vancomycin group,and there was no significant difference between the two groups(P〈0.05).The incidence of adverse reactions of the teicoplanin group was 4.47%,lower than that of the vancomycin group(P〈0.05).The Staphylococcus aureus was the predominant species among the isolated pathogens,followed by the Enterococcus faecium.CONCLUSION Teicoplanin and vancomycin may achieve remarkable effect on treatment of the gram-positive bacteria infections,however,teicoplanin is safer than vancomycin.
出处 《中华医院感染学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2018年第2期173-176,共4页 Chinese Journal of Nosocomiology
基金 河北省卫生厅科研基金资助项目(1020140238)
关键词 替考拉宁 万古霉素 革兰阳性菌 临床疗效 Teicoplanin Vancomycin Gram-positive bacteria Clinical effect
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

二级参考文献100

  • 1陈文昭,吴爱华,谢轶.2006年四川大学华西医院呼吸科常见病原菌耐药分析[J].华西医学,2007,22(4):783-784. 被引量:3
  • 2杨青,俞云松,倪语星,孙景勇,徐英春,孙宏莉,孙自镛,简翠,汪复,朱德妹,胡付品,蒋晓飞,王传清,王爱敏,卓超,苏丹虹,胡云建,艾效曼,黄文祥,贾蓓,张朝霞,季萍,张泓,李万华,魏莲花,吴玲,徐元宏,沈继录,单斌,杜艳.2009年中国CHINET肠球菌属细菌耐药性监测[J].中国感染与化疗杂志,2010,10(6):421-425. 被引量:61
  • 3徐赤裔,金雨虹,陈东妹.万古霉素与替考拉宁治疗老年MRSA/MRSE肺部感染的疗效比较[J].现代实用医学,2006,18(9):656-657. 被引量:26
  • 4吕晓菊.细菌耐药的机制与对策[J].临床内科杂志,2007,24(5):295-297. 被引量:13
  • 5徐业成,苗丽,雷小红,邓万俊.达托霉素治疗菌血症及感染性心内膜炎的研究进展[J].国外医药(抗生素分册),2007,28(5):219-224. 被引量:13
  • 6Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Nos- ocomial Int'eetions Surveillance (NNIS) System report, data summary from January 1992 through June 2004[J]. Am J Infect Control,2004,32(8) :470 485.
  • 7Almyroudis NG, Lesse AJ, Hahn T, et al. Molecular epi- demiology and risk factors for colonization by vancomy- cin-resistant Enterococcus in patients with hematologic malignancies[J]. Infect Cont Hosp Ep,2011.32(5) :490- 496.
  • 8Dutka-Malen S. Evers S, Courvalin P. Detetion of glyco peptide resistance genotypes and identification to lhe spe cies level of clinically enterococci by PCR[J]. J Clin Mi crobiol, 1995,33(1) :24-27.
  • 9Hsieh YC,Lee WS,Ou TY,et al. Clonal spread of CC17 vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium with multilo cus sequence type 78 (ST78) and a novel ST444 in Tai wan[J]. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis, 2010,29 ( 1 ) : 25 -30.
  • 10Zhu X, Zheng B, Wang S, et al. Molecular characterisation of outbreak-related strains of vancomycin resistant En terococeus faecium from an intensive care unit in Beijing, China[J]. J Hosp Infect,2009,72(2) :147-154.

共引文献82

同被引文献205

引证文献28

二级引证文献67

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部