研究型大学长聘教职制度:争议、改革与借鉴

Tenure System Reform in American Research University: Dispute, Reform and Reference

在当前我国研究型大学教师人事管理改革的背景下推进长聘教职制度还存在一些实然困境,包括改革行动逻辑与改革初衷的矛盾、改革制度设计与传统教师人事管理制度的冲突、改革成效与改革预期的偏差等。长聘教职制度发源于美国,由于长聘教职制度在保障研究型大学学术自由中的限度及长聘教职制度设计自身的缺陷,美国研究型大学对这一制度的改革从未停止。重新审视长聘教职制度的形成过程,探讨美国研究型大学长聘教职制度背后存在的争议及改革举措,有助于进一步厘清当前我国研究型大学长聘教职制度改革的逻辑,在尊重学术劳动力市场运行规律的前提下彰显研究型大学长聘教职制度改革的示范效应和制度红利。

The tenure system reform in Chinese university has gone through difficult exploration, and due to the contradiction between the mobile logic and the intention of the tenure reform, the conflict between the tenure system design and the current faculty personnel management system, and the deviation between the actual reform effect and the expectation, the ongoing tenure system reform still encounters many dilemmas in practice. Tenure system originated from American university, and due to the limitation in protecting academic freedom and internal weakness, the system is changing all the time. Abiding by the rule in academic labor market, to reconsider the reflect on the history and reality of the tenure system in American university and discuss the disputes behind the tenure system can make out the logic of the reform and release the benefit of the reform in research university.