期刊文献+

内生官员业绩奖励与外生监管机制对公共物品供给影响的实验研究

T he experimental research of the governance mechanism for the free-rider problem
下载PDF
导出
摘要 公共物品具有消费的非竞争性与受益的非排他性,其中非排他性往往会引发难以解决的搭便车问题。设计一组重复实验,探究公共物品搭便车问题的治理机制。实验结果表明:如将公共物品供给程度作为官员政绩考核标准之一,权力执行者会更有意愿加强对公共物品供给的监管。同时,监管的频率对公共物品供给起到显著的正相关影响;监管越频繁,公共物品供给越多。而处罚力度对公共物品供给影响不显著。由权力执行者进行的外部惩罚机制确实能让参与者减少搭便车行为,使得公共物品供给效率增加,从而缓解搭便车问题。该实验结果在环境污染、食品安全等方面具有很重要的指导意义。 Public goods have two properties: the non-exclusive of the benefit and the non-competitive of the consumption.The non-exclusive of the benefit often triggers the free-rider problem. In this paper we designed a set of repeated experiments,exploring the governance mechanism for the free-rider problem. The results of the experiments show that: if we consider the degree of public goods supply as one of evaluation standards for the officials,executives in power will be more willing to strengthen the supervision of the public goods supply. Meanwhile,the regulatory frequency has significant positive correlative effect on the public goods supply,but penalties have no significant effect on the public goods supply. The external punishment mechanism performs by executives in power can actually lead the participants to reduce the free riding behavior,improving the freerider problem. The experimental results provide significant guidance in solving environmental pollution problems,food safety issues,and corruption problems.
作者 黄姗姗 刘文杰 马凌峰 吕文慧 HUANG Shanshan;LIU Wenjie;MA Lingfeng;LV Wenhui(School of Economics, Nanjing University of Finance and Economics, Nanjing 210023, China)
出处 《南京财经大学学报》 2017年第6期50-58,共9页 Journal of Nanjing University of Finance and Economics
基金 国家自然科学青年基金项目(71603113) 国家自然科学基金项目(71501088) 国家自然科学基金青年项目(71501089) 国家自然科学基金青年项目(71503118) 教育部人文社会科学研究青年项目(14YJC790067) 江苏省高校品牌专业建设一期工程(PPZY2015B103) 南京财经大学高教研究课题(GJ201510) 南京财经大学2016年校级教学成果培育立项项目(JXCGPY201603)
关键词 搭便车 治理机制 实验研究 内生奖励 外生监管 free-rider the governance mechanism experimental research internal rewards external supervision
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献126

  • 1董香书,Proochista Ariana.为何农村医生工作不满意?--工作收入、医患关系和工作满意度的实证研究[J].管理世界,2012(11):77-88. 被引量:31
  • 2叶航,汪丁丁,罗卫东.作为内生偏好的利他行为及其经济学意义[J].经济研究,2005,40(8):84-94. 被引量:150
  • 3Sadrieh, A., and Verbon, H.A.A., 2006, “Inequality, Cooperation, and Growth: An Experimental Study”, European Economic Review, 5: 1197-1222.
  • 4Isaac, R.M., McCue, K., and Plott, C., 1985, "Public Goods Provision in an Experimental Environment", Journal of Public Economics, 26: 51-74.
  • 5Isaac, R.M., and Walker, J.M., 1988b, “Group Size Effects in Public Goods Provision: The Voluntary Contribution Mechanism”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 103 : 179-199.
  • 6Isaac, R.M., Walker, J.M., and Williams, A., 1994, “Group Size and the Voluntary Provision of Public Goods: Experimental Evidence Utilizing Very Large Groups”, Journal of Public Economics, 54: 1-36.
  • 7Kurzban, R., and Houser, D., 2005, “Experiments Investigating Cooperative Types in Humans: A Complement to Evolutionary Theory and Simulations”, PNAS, 102: 1803-1807.
  • 8Laury, S.K., Walker, J.M., and Williams A.W., 1999, "The Voluntary Provision of a Pure Public Good with Diminishing Marginal Returns", Public Choice, 99: 139-160.
  • 9Ledyard, J.O., 1995, “Public Goods: A Survey of Experimental Research” in Kagel, J.H., and Roth, A.E., (Eds.), Handbook of Experimental Economics, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  • 10Levy-Garboua, L., Meidinger, C., and Rapoport, B., 2006, “The Formation of Social Preferences: Some Lessons from Psychology and Biology”, in S. Kolm and Jean Mercier Ythier (ed.), 2006, Handbook on the Economics of Giving, Reciprocity and Altruism, volume 1, Elsevier.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部