期刊文献+

语言测试效度与公平性研究 被引量:4

Validity and Fairness in Language Assessment
原文传递
导出
摘要 效度是评判一项测试质量的重要指标,而公平性又是效度的重要保证。本文结合测试效度观及其验证模式的发展变化.对近50年来语言测试公平性观念及其研究模式在分类、整体、论证3种效度观时期的演变进行梳理与思考,发现语言测试公平性研究采取的几乎是与效度研究一样的进路,学界对公平性研究的必要性存在争议。在以上分析的基础上,本文总结二者之间的关系,并指出未来测试公平性研究应继续努力的方向。 Validity has been regarded as the key element of any assessment and fairness plays a very important role in achieving high validity. Based on the conceptual changes of validity and changes in the modes of validation, this paper deals with the evolution of fairness studies in language assessment over the past 50 years from the following three perspectives: categorized, unitary and argumentative validity concepts. It reveals that the methods and contents in the study of fairness are nearly the same as those in the study of validity and validation and the assessment experts have different views towards the necessity of the fairness exploration in language assessment. According to the analysis above, the paper summarizes the relationship between the two and points out what the further studies should explore thoroughly in the future.
作者 姜秀娟
出处 《外语学刊》 CSSCI 北大核心 2018年第1期97-102,共6页 Foreign Language Research
基金 山东省社科规划基金项目“高考英语、托福和雅思听力测试的测量目标及任务设置比较研究”(16CZWJ29)的阶段性成果
关键词 语言测试 效度 公平性 language assessment validity fairness
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献55

  • 1AERA, APA & NCME. 1999. Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing [M]. Washington, D. C. : American Psychological Association.
  • 2APA, 1954. Technical recommendations for psychological tests and diagnostic techniques[J]. Psychological Bulletin Supplement 51: 1-38.
  • 3APA, AERA & NCME. 1966. Standards for Educational and Psychological Tests andManuals [M]. Washington, D. C. : American Psychological Association.
  • 4Bachman, L. 1990. Fundamental Considerations in Language Testing [M]. Oxford; OUP.
  • 5Bachman, L. 2003. Constructing an assessment use argument and supporting claims abouttest taker-assessment task interactions in evidence-centered assessment design [J].Measurement : Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives 1 : 63-65.
  • 6Bachman, L. 2005. Building and supporting a case for test use [J]. Language AssessmentQuarterly 2: 1-34.
  • 7Bachman, L. & A. Palmer. 1996. Language Testing in Practice [M]. Oxford: OUP.
  • 8Bachman, L. &A. Palmer. 2010. Language Assessment in Practice : Developing LanguageAssessments and Justifying Their Use in the Real World [M]. Oxford : OUP.
  • 9Bingham,W. 1937. Aptitudes and Aptitude Testing [M]. New York: Harper & Brothers.
  • 10Briggs,D. 2004. Comment: Making an argument for design validity before interpretive va-lidity [J]. Measurement 2: 171-174.

共引文献53

同被引文献18

引证文献4

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部