期刊文献+

电视胸腔镜手术治疗原发性肺癌的疗效观察 被引量:7

Observation of Curative Effect of Video-assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery for Primary Lung Cancer
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的观察电视胸腔镜手术治疗原发性肺癌患者的疗效。方法选取原发性肺癌患者60例,随机分成电视胸腔镜组(n=40)及开胸组(n=20),电视胸腔镜组患者采用电视胸腔镜手术治疗,开胸组患者采用开胸手术治疗,对比两组患者的疗效及术后并发症发生情况。结果与开胸组相比,电视胸腔镜组患者手术切口、引流管放置时间、住院天数较短,手术出血量较少,术后VAS评分较低(P<0.001)。电视胸腔镜组患者总并发症发生率为20.0%,低于开胸组(55.0%),差异有统计学意义(χ~2=7.548,P=0.006)。淋巴结清扫数目、肺癌病理分型在两组患者间比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论电视胸腔镜手术治疗早期原发性肺癌具有开胸手术相同的效果,并具有术后并发症少、创伤小、恢复快等优势。 Objective To observe the curative effect of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for primary lung cancer. Methods 60 patients with primary lung cancer were randomly divided into video-assisted thoracoscopie surgery(VATS) group( n = 40) and thoracotomy group( n = 20). Patients in the VATS group were treated by video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery, and the thoracotomy group were treated by thoracic surgery treatment. The curative effect and postoperative complications of patients of the 2 groups were compared. Results Compared to thoracotomy group,patients in the VATS group had shorter surgical incision and drainage time, hospital stay, less amount of bleeding, lower postoperative VAS score (P 〈 O. 001 ). The total incidence of complica- tion of patients in the VATS group was 20% ,lower than those of thoracotomy group(55% ) and the difference was statistically sig- nificant( χ^2 = 7.548 ,P = 0.006 ). There were no statistically significant differences in the number of lymph node dissection and pathological types of lung cancer between the 2 groups ( P 〉 0.05 ). Conclusion The curative effect of video-assisted thoraco- scopic surgery for primary lung cancer is the same as thoracic surgery, but it has advantage in less postoperative complications, less trauma and faster recovery.
出处 《实用癌症杂志》 2018年第2期265-267,共3页 The Practical Journal of Cancer
关键词 电视胸腔镜 原发性肺癌 开胸 疗效 并发症 Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) Primary lung cancer Thoracic Curative effect Complication
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献69

  • 1何建行,杨运有,陈汉章,吴哲凡,韦兵,邵文龙,殷伟强,杨德康.胸腔镜辅助小切口肺血管/支气管成形术治疗肺肿瘤[J].中国肺癌杂志,2007,10(4):301-305. 被引量:11
  • 2Ettinger DS, Akerley W, Bcpler G, et al. Non-small cell lung cancer. J Natl Compr Canc Netw, 2010, 8(7) : 740-801.
  • 3Liu LX, Che GW, Pu Q, et al. A new concept of endoscopic lung cancer resection: Single direction thoracoscopic lobectomy. Surg Oncol, 2010, 19(2): e71-e77.
  • 4Mahtabifard A, Fuller CB, McKenna RJ Jr. Video assisted thoracic surgery sleeve lobectomy: a case series. Ann Thorac Surg, 2008, 85(2): $729-$732.
  • 5Ma Z, Dong A, Fan J, et al. Does sleeve lobectomy concomitant with or without pulmonary artery reconstruction (double sleeve) have favorable results for non-small cell lung cancer compared with pneumonectomy? A meta analysis. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, 2007, 32(1): 20-28.
  • 6Santambrogio L, Cioffi U, De Simone M, et al. Video-assisted sleeve lobectomy for mucoepidermoid carcinoma of the left lower lobar bronchus: a case report. Chest, 2002, 121(2): 635-636.
  • 7Kim MP, Ernst A, DeCamp MM, et al. Endobronchial ultrasound facilitated video-Assisted lobectomy with wedge bronchoplasty for typical carcinoid tumor of the right middle lobe. Chest, 2008, 138(6): 1474-1476.
  • 8Karmakar MK, Ho AM. Postthoracotomy pain syndrome. Thorac Surg Clin, 2004, 14:345-352.
  • 9Tajiri M, Maehara T, Nakayama H, et al. Decreased invasiveness via two methods of thoracoscopic lobeetomy for lung cancer, compared with open thoracotomy. Respirology, 2007, 12:207- 211.
  • 10Scott WJ, Allen MS, Darling G, et al. Video-assisted thoracic surgery versus open lobectomy for lung cancer: a secondary analysis of data from the American College of Surgeons Oncology Group Z0030 randomized clinical trial. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2010, 139:976-981.

共引文献251

同被引文献65

引证文献7

二级引证文献76

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部