期刊文献+

后金融危机时代的全球反避税措施:国别差异路径和全球有限合作 被引量:9

Global Anti-Tax-Evasion Measures in the Post-2008 Era:Idiosyncratic Path among Countries and Limited Cooperation in World
原文传递
导出
摘要 全球金融危机之后,各国财政趋紧。同时,跨国企业为了扩大利润,通过不同的税收筹划实现避税目标,侵蚀国家税基。全球范围内打击税基侵蚀和利润转移的国际合作重新提上议程,成为国际经济治理的重要议题。但是,由于国家之间的经济竞争和规则主导权博弈,国际税收监管合作多停留在双边范围,多边税收监管合作仅在涉税信息分享方面有所进展。主要国家在后金融危机时代采取的反避税措施呈现出国别差异路径和有限国际合作。究其实质,这些差别路径主要是国内法域外效力的规则和执行力的竞争。本文讨论反避税领域的主要措施,并从国内法和国际法两个维度分析这些差异路径的形成原因和全球反避税有限合作的法律机理。 After the global financial crisis,the fiscal conditions have been tough all over the world.At the same time,multinational companies are trying to expand profits by using different tax plans to achieve tax avoidance targets,which erodes the national tax base. International cooperation in combating tax base erosion and profit transfer has been rescheduled to become important issues in international economic governance. However,due to economic competition and rule-making combating among countries,international tax regulatory cooperation generally stays in the range of bilateral,while multilateral tax regulatory cooperation has only made progress in terms of tax-related information sharing. The anti-tax-evasion measures adopted by major countries in the post-financial crisis era show the characteristics of idiosyncratic path and limited cooperation,which,essentially,shows how to enforce domestic law overseas. This paper discusses the main measures in the field of anti-tax avoidance,and analyzes the formation of these difference paths from the dimensions of domestic law and international law and the legal mechanism of limited cooperation concerning anti-tax-evasion.
作者 沈伟
机构地区 山东大学法学院
出处 《比较法研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2018年第1期122-142,共21页 Journal of Comparative Law
基金 中国法学会2016年度部级法学研究重点课题"国际金融治理体系重建--以G20为中心"[项目号:CLS(2016)B09]的部分研究成果
关键词 反避税 “返程投资” 698号文 国际税收合作 anti - tax - evasion round - trip investment No. 698 [ 2009 ] of the state administration of taxation international tax cooperation
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献25

  • 1.《经济合作与发展组织关于对所得和财产避免双重征税的协定范本》[Z].,..
  • 2刘永伟.《制定多边税收协定的若干思考》[A]..《中国国际经济法年会论文集》(上册)[C].,2003年.第98-101页.
  • 3刘永伟.《国际税法基本原则之探讨》[A]..《中国国际法学精萃》(2003年卷)[C].机械工业出版社,2004年1月版.第258-261页.
  • 4.《国际税收冲突的解决》[R].,..
  • 5Michael Lang etc., Multilateral Tax Treaties, Kluwer Law International, 1998, p. 86.
  • 6Diane M. Ring,Commentary: Prospects for a Multilateral Tax Treaty, 26 Brooklyn Journal of International Law, 2001, p. 1706 - 1708.
  • 7Daniel Berman, Part Ⅱ: Departing U.S. Treasmy Staffer Discusses Treaties, 15 Tax Notes International, 1997, pp. 949 - 951.
  • 8Michael Lang etc., Multilateral Tax Treaties, Kluwex Law International, 1998,p. 189.
  • 9Michael Lang, etc., Multilateral Tax Treaties, Kluwer Law International, 1998, p.3.
  • 10Joel Lubell, India - German Tax Tax Has Most Favoured Nation Consequences, Tax Notes International 1996, p.1673.

共引文献16

引证文献9

二级引证文献18

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部