摘要
Modem analytical models for anti-monopoly laws are a core element of the application of those laws. Since the Anti-Monopoly Law of the People＇s Republic of China was promulgated in 2008, law enforcement and judicial authorities have applied different analytical models, leading to divergent legal and regulatory outcomes as similar cases receive different verdicts. To select a suitable analytical model for China＇s Anti-Monopoly Law, we need to consider the possible contribution of both economic analysis and legal formalism and to learn from the mature systems and experience of foreign countries. It is also necessary to take into account such binding constraints as the current composition of China＇s anti-monopoly legal system, the ability of implementing agencies and the supply of economic analysis, in order to ensure complementarity between the analytical model chosen and the complexity of economic analysis and between the professionalism of implementing agencies and the cost of compliance for participants in economic activities. In terms of institutional design, the models should provide a considered explanation of the legislative aims of the law＇s provisions. It is necessary, therefore, to establish a processing model of behavioral classification that is based on China＇s national conditions, applies analytical models using normative comprehensive analysis, makes use of the distribution rule of burden of proof, improves supporting systems related to analytical models and enhances the ability of public authorities to implement the law.
现代反垄断法分析模式是反垄断法适用的核心环节。自2008年中国《反垄断法》实施以来，执法和司法机关在分析模式的适用上存在差异，导致同案不同判等有悖法制统一性的后果。选择晗当的反垄断法分析模式，应兼顾经济分析和法律形式主义两方面的可能贡献，在借鉴国外成熟制度经验的同时，充分考虑当前中国反垄断法制度构成、实施机关能力和经济分析供给状况等约束性条件，确保分析模式选择与经济分析的复杂程度、实施机关的专业水平以及经济活动参与者的守法成本等相互匹配。在制度设计上，应审慎解释立法目的条款，建立适合中国国情的行为类型化处理模式，规范全面分析的分析模式的适用和发挥的作用，完善分析模式相关的配套制度并提升公权机关实施法律的能力。
