期刊文献+

构建中国式的听证审查逮捕程序 被引量:22

Constructing the Hearing Procedure of Examination of Criminal Arrest with Chinese Characteristic
原文传递
导出
摘要 我国现行审查批准逮捕程序存在行政化弊端:审查批捕主体地位不中立、犯罪嫌疑人的程序参与权没有得到有效保障、检察机关无须向犯罪嫌疑人及其辩护律师说明逮捕理由、犯罪嫌疑人没有任何救济权。近年来刑事司法体制改革的系列举措、各地检察机关的听证式审查批捕的尝试性探索、其他国家的先进立法经验以及批准加入《公民权利与政治权利国际公约》的准入条件,使得建构听证审查逮捕程序具有现实必要性。应该从五个方面建构听证审查逮捕程序:审查批准逮捕的决定主体、案件范围、参与听证审查逮捕程序的主体、程序的申请与启动、具体的操作程序。 There are defects in China' s current procedure of examination and approval of criminal arrest : the subject who is responsible for examination and approval is not neutral, the suspect' s right of participation is not ensured, the procuratorate does not need to explain the reason for arrest to the suspect and his defense law- yer, and the suspect does not have the right to relief. In recent years, a series of measures have been taken un- der the background of criminal judicial reform, the procuratorial organs' exploration of hearing procedure of ex- amination and approval of criminal arrest, the legislative experience of other countries and the criteria for ac- cessing the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights make it necessary to construct the hearing pro- cedure of examination of criminal arrest. The hearing procedure of examination of criminal arrest should be con- structed from five aspects: the subject of examining and approving the criminal arrest, the scope of cases, the main bodies participated in the procedure, the application and initiation of the procedure and the specific pro- cedure of operation.
作者 张泽涛
机构地区 广州大学法学院
出处 《政法论坛》 CSSCI 北大核心 2018年第1期18-28,共11页 Tribune of Political Science and Law
基金 2016年度司法部“国家法治建设与法学理论研究项目”阶段性成果,课题编号:16SFB2025(课题名称:“审判中心主义视角下刑事涉案财物处理机制研究”)
关键词 听证 救济权 中立 批捕权 Hearing Right to Relief Neutrality Right to Approving Criminal Arrest
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献96

共引文献107

同被引文献280

引证文献22

二级引证文献89

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部