摘要
目的研究分析新生儿接受优质护理管理的临床效果。方法 2015年2月—2016年12月我院对90例新生儿进行了分组研究。对照组患者接受常规护理管理,优质组接受优质护理管理。对两组患儿接受护理后的病情改善情况进行对比分析。结果优质组患儿的病情改善情况比对照组优秀(χ~2=5.255,P<0.05),对照组有18例显著改善,19例改善,8例无改善,总改善率是82.22%;优质组显著改善33例,改善10例,无改善2例,总改善率是95.56%。优质组红疹不良反应发生率比对照组低(χ~2=6.146,P<0.05)。对照组发生率为20.00%,优质组为8.87%。优质组平均住院(6.39±2.12)d、患儿家属平均满意度(98.39±3.51)分,对照组为(8.51±2.61)d、(85.62±1.21)分,结果差异有统计学意义(t=3.143,8.624,P<0.05)。结论新生儿护理使用优质护理管理具有比较好的效果,临床不良反应率低,住院时间短,满意度高。
Objective To study and analyze the clinical effect of newborns receiving high quality nursing management. Methods From February 2015 to December 2016, 90 newborns were divided into groups in our hospital. The control group was given routine nursing management, and high quality group was given high quality nursing management. The improvement of the two groups of children after nursing was compared and analyzed. Results The condition of the high quality group was better than the control group(χ2=5.255, P < 0.05). In the control group, 18 cases were significantly improved, 19 cases were improved, and 8 cases were not improved. The total improvement rate was 82.22%. 33 cases were improved significantly in high quality group, 10 cases were improved, and 2 cases were not improved, the total improvement rate was 95.56%. The quality group rash adverse reaction rate lower than the control group(χ2=6.146, P < 0.05). The incidence of the control group was 20.00%, and the quality group was 8.87%. In the high quality group, the average hospitalization was(6.39 ± 2.12) d and the average satisfaction of the family members(98.39 ± 3.51) points. The control group was(8.51 ± 2.61) d and(85.62 ± 1.21) points, the difference was statistically significant(t=3.143, 8.624, P < 0.05). Conclusion The use of high quality nursing management in neonatal nursing has a good effect. The clinical adverse reaction rate is low, hospitalization time is short and satisfaction is high.
出处
《中国卫生标准管理》
2018年第3期143-144,共2页
China Health Standard Management
关键词
新生儿护理
优质护理管理
应用
可行性
neonatal nursing
high quality nursing management
application
feasibility