摘要
正当防卫是法律赋予公民的一项重要的自我保护权利。我国司法实践中在正当防卫的认定标准上存在"认定难"的问题,民众对什么情况下才能实施正当防卫更是模糊不清。特别是正当防卫中不法侵害范围、正当防卫限度的认定标准等问题,在理论上的观点仍不统一,导致司法实务很难把握正当防卫的认定标准。基于于欢案的思考,深入探讨司法实践对正当防卫的判定和现行法律依据存在的主要问题,并通过现有的学说、理论具体分析正当防卫的认定标准。
Justifiable defense is an important right on self-protection for the citizens,which is granted by the law. In the judicial practice of China,there is a difficulty in identifying the criteria standard of justifiable defense. What is more,people feel puzzled about the situation when they are allowed to do justifiable defense. In judicial practice,it is quite difficult to handle this criteria standard,because the theoretical point of views have been not unanimous,especially towards the scope of illegal infringement in justifiable defense and the standard of the limitation on justifiable defense. Based on the consideration of YU Huan case,this paper deeply discusses the judgment on justifiable defense in judicial practice and the existing main problems of current legal basis for justifiable defense. Then,according to the existing theory,it analyzes the criteria standard of justifiable defense in details.
出处
《长沙大学学报》
2018年第1期94-97,共4页
Journal of Changsha University
关键词
正当防卫
不法侵害
认定标准
防卫过当
justifiable defense
illegal infringement
criteria standard
excessive defense