曹丕、曹植文学批评建树比较观

Comparative View of Literary Criticism Achievement by Cao Pi and Cao Zhi

长期以来,无论是中国文学史研究,还是中国古代文论研究,几乎一边倒地看重曹丕的《典论·论文》,而有意淡化曹植的文学批评建树,以致在建安文学研究中,出现种种"扬丕抑植"的偏见。本文立足于现有文本研究,兼及曹丕、曹植有关文章面世时间的考订,既从文学批评史的宏观角度,又从特定文本既有内涵的微观角度,比较分析了这兄弟二人的文学批评建树,得出的结论是:曹植的建树胜过曹丕一筹。

For a long period of time,both in the research of Chinese literature history and that of ancient Chinese literary theory,almost without exceptions,people valued Cao Pi＇s＂Comments on Papers＂in his Dian Lun,and intentionally downplayed Cao Zhi＇s literary criticism achievement so that in the research of＂Jian＇an literature＂,appeared the prejudice of＂praising PI and depreciating Zhi＂.Based on the existing text studies,and the research of creative time of the relevant articles by Cao Pi and Cao Zhi,this paper made comparative analysis of the literary criticism achievements by the two Cao brothers both from the macro angle of literary criticism history and from the microscopic angle of the connotation of their articles and arrived at the conclusion that Cao Zhi did better in literary criticism than Cao Pi.