摘要
段玉裁的校勘学思想颇有别于乾嘉学者,其崇尚义理校勘,不迷信古本宋本,务以求是为目的,以义理为归宿,主张勇于改字、写成定本以惠后世之学,与顾千里"不校校之"的校勘主张相抵牾。其崇尚义理的校勘学思想和主张虽有其高妙处,精于理校亦是段氏长处,然此种以义理先行的校勘法易流于主观、武断,反不如顾氏"不校校之"的校勘法来得稳妥、审慎和科学。
Duan Yucai's textual criticism thought was quite different from the scholars, which advocated the argumentation collation, without relying on the ancient books or books of Song Dynasty. It took practice as the purpose, argumentation as the resxxlt, promoted to emend the Chinese character and record in book, so as to benefit the later generations, which was contradict with the inatural emendationw adovated by Gu Qianli. Although the thoughts and ideas of textual criticism theory has its advantages, and it is also skilled in scientific emendation, this textual criticism which takes argumentation as the first tends to be subjective and arbitrary, and it is not as proper, cautious and scientific as Gu's "natural emendation".
出处
《牡丹江大学学报》
2018年第2期4-7,共4页
Journal of Mudanjiang University
关键词
段玉裁
校勘学思想
义理校勘
Duan Yucai
textual criticism thought
argumentation collation