摘要
对于利用"有故意无身份工具"的犯罪情形,刑法理论上国内外学者提出各种学说观点且争议不断,如间接正犯说、教唆犯说、共同正犯说以及区别对待说等。刑法理论指导司法实践,为避免司法实务中具体案件出现不同处理结果,有必要通过研究国内外学者面对此种情形的具体解决方式,并对诸多观点进行整合分析,以明晰该问题的脉络。
For the crime of using "intentional non-identity tools",domestic and foreign scholars put forward various doctrines and always controversial.The criminal law theory such as indirect crime , abettor, joint principal offenders,distinction treated, etc.The criminal law theory guide the judicial practice, in order to avoid the different results of specific cases occur in the judicial practice, it is necessary to study the resolution of the domestic and foreign scholars when they face with this specific solutions,integration and analysis of these views, in order to clear the context of this problem.
出处
《牡丹江大学学报》
2018年第2期104-107,共4页
Journal of Mudanjiang University
关键词
共犯
正犯
间接正犯
教唆犯
accomplice
principal offender
indirect crime
abettor