期刊文献+

疑难病例分诊的追踪学习在门诊分诊培训中的应用 被引量:8

Application of follow-up learning of difficult cases triage in outpatient triage training
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨疑难病例分诊的追踪学习在门诊分诊培训中的应用效果。方法 2016年6月至9月对就诊需分诊的患者做好分诊疑难病例追踪登记,并落实个案学习计划。比较实施前后的疑难病例分诊与追踪结果一致的比例和由于护士分诊原因导致护理投诉所占的比例。结果实施后疑难病例分诊与实际就诊结果一致的比例高于实施前,实施后护士分诊原因导致的护理投诉比例低于实施前,前后比较,差异有统计学意义(均P<0.05)。结论疑难病例追踪学习能提高门诊分诊正确率以改善及患者就医体验。 Objective To investigate the effectiveness of follow -u p learning of difficult cases triage in outpatient triagetraining. Methods From June 2016 to September, on-duty nurses were required to register the difficult cases who needed to follow up. The case study plan was implemented. The consistency between difficult cases triage and the follow-up results and the rate of complaints from triage were compared between pre- and post-implementation of triage training. Results The rate of consistency between the difficult cases triage and the follow-up results after the implementation was significantly higher than that before the implementation (P〈0.05). The rate of complaints from triage was significantly lower than that before the implementation (P〈0.05). Conclusion The model of difficult cases follow-up learning is effective in improving the triage accuracy in outpatient departments and bettering the patients' experience.
出处 《现代临床护理》 2017年第11期50-53,共4页 Modern Clinical Nursing
关键词 疑难病例 预检分诊 difficult cases outpatient triage
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献85

  • 1宋继兰,孔飞.影响急诊分诊准确率的护士因素调查分析[J].河北医学,2004,10(11):1040-1042. 被引量:7
  • 2张亚卓,韩悦容.护患双向沟通式急诊分诊的探讨[J].解放军护理杂志,2004,21(11):75-76. 被引量:31
  • 3张俊玲.门诊护理服务存在的问题及改进措施[J].中国误诊学杂志,2006,6(10):1964-1965. 被引量:15
  • 4Emergency Nurses Association. Emergency nurses association position statement: Crowding in the emergency department[J]]. J Emerg Nurs,2006,32(1):42-47.
  • 5李树贞.医院护理管理培训教材[M].南京:解放军出版社,2001.160-169.
  • 6赖玉明.对基层医院门诊分诊准确率的影响因素及干预对策.当代医药论丛,2014,4(4):295-296.
  • 7Emergency Nurses Association. Emergency Nurses As- sociation position statement., crowding in the emergen- cy department. J Emerg Nurs. 2006,32(1) :42-47.
  • 8Esmailian M, Zamani M, Azadi F, et al. Inter-rater agree- ment of emergency nurses and physicians in emergency severity index (ESI) triage [ J ]. Emerg (Tehran), 2014,2 (4):158-161.
  • 9Steiner D, Renetseder F, Kutz A, et al. Performance of the Manchester triage system in adult medical emergency pati-ents: a prospective cohort study [ J]. J Emerg Med, 2015(9):8-12.
  • 10Fernandes CM, Tanabe P, Gilboy N, et al. Five level triage: a report from the ACEP/ENA five level triage task force [ J ]. J Emerg Nurs, 2005,31 ( 1 ) : 39-50.

共引文献104

同被引文献49

引证文献8

二级引证文献15

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部