摘要
目的对脊柱创伤患者接受PCS椎弓根螺钉治疗的临床效果开展研究分析。方法对我院接受治疗的脊柱创伤患者82例进行研究分析,共分研究组和对照组两组,均为41例,对照组患者接受普通椎弓根螺钉治疗,研究组接受PCS椎弓根螺钉治疗,对两组的治疗效果进行比较。结果两组的手术时间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),研究组出血量、住院时间优于对照组(P<0.05)。术前的VAS、ODI两组差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),术后两组评分均下降,研究组降低幅度大于对照组(P<0.05)。术前两组的椎体Coob’s角度差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),术后半年均降低,研究组优于对照组(P<0.05)。研究组有23例脊柱神经损伤,占56.10%,对照组有24例神经损伤,占58.54%(P>0.05)。结论 PCS椎弓根螺钉治疗脊柱创伤具有较好的效果,患者恢复快,安全性高。
Objective To investigate the clinical effects of PCS pedicle screw therapy for patients with spinal trauma. Methods 82 patients with spinal injury treated in our hospital were analyzed and divided into study group and control group, 41 cases in each group, the control group received conventional pedicle screw fxation for the treatment, the study group received the treatment of PCS pedicle screws, the therapeutic effect of the two groups was compared. Results There was no statistical difference in the operation time between the two groups （P 〉 0.05）, and the amount of bleeding and the time of hospitalization in the study group were better than those of the control group （P 〈 0.05）. There was no statistical difference between the two groups of VAS and ODI before operation （P 〉 0.05）. The scores of the two groups decreased after the operation, and the decrease in the study group was greater than that of the control group （P 〈 0.05）. There was no statistical difference in the Coob ＇s angle between the two groups before the operation （P 〉 0.05）, and decreased half an year after the operation, and the study group was better than the control group （P 〈 0.05）. There were 23 cases of spinal nerve injury in the study group, accounting for 56.10%, and 24 cases of nerve injury in the control group, accounting for 58.54% （P 〉 0.05）. Conclusion PCS pedicle screw has a good effect in the treatment of spinal trauma. The patients recover quickly and have high safety.
出处
《中国卫生标准管理》
2018年第2期51-52,共2页
China Health Standard Management
