下颌阻生智齿两种拔除方法术后生活质量的对比研究被引量：1

A comparative study on the quality of life after two extraction methods of mandibular impacted wisdom teeth

下载PDF

导出

摘要目的探究高速涡轮钻法与传统锤凿法对下颌阻生智齿患者治疗后对其生活质量的影响。方法选取本院2015年9月~2017年6月收治的104例下颌阻生智齿患者,将其分为对照组和观察组,各52例。观察组采用高速涡轮钻法治疗,对照组采用传统锤凿法治疗。并对比两组患者术后的生活质量评分。结果观察组疼痛及日常活动方面评分低于对照组(P<0.05);观察组外观评分比对照组高(P<0.05);观察组与对照组语言、感觉、饮食、恶心呕吐及总分比较(P>0.05)。结论与传统锤凿法相比,高速涡轮钻法可使下颌阻生智齿患者术后疼痛显著减轻,防止患者出现恐惧心理,但可能会使术后局部肿胀症状加重。

作者顾振威

机构地区常熟包兴隆口腔门诊部

出处《全科口腔医学电子杂志》 2018年第1期54-55,共2页 Electronic Journal of General Stomatology

关键词下颌阻生智齿高速涡轮钻法传统锤凿法生活质量

分类号 R782.11 [医药卫生—口腔医学]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献6

1宋元玲,任辉,李晓刚,杜文斌,李尔涛.氟比洛芬酯联合地塞米松用于拔除下颌阻生智齿术后镇痛效果观察[J].现代中西医结合杂志,2016,25(24):2716-2718. 被引量：16
2乔峰,隋磊,张健.龈瓣缝合类型对下颌阻生智齿拔除术后生活质量的影响[J].天津医药,2015,43(9):1000-1002. 被引量：5
3魏巍,张建明,韩璐.两种下颌智齿拔除法对早期冠周炎患者生活质量的影响[J].遵义医学院学报,2015,38(2):171-174. 被引量：7
4梁清军.两种方法拔除下颌阻生智齿的效果比较[J].口腔颌面外科杂志,2015,25(3):195-198. 被引量：40
5李行健,王进.微创拔牙术在下颌阻生智齿拔除中的应用[J].世界临床医学,2017,11(3):181-182. 被引量：23
6黄昕,朱东望.下颌阻生智齿两种拔除方法术后生活质量的对比研究[J].全科口腔医学电子杂志,2016,3(3):139-140. 被引量：8

二级参考文献49

1De Oliveira C M, Sheiham A. Orthodontic treatment and its impact on oral health - related quality of life in Brazil- ian adolescents [ J ]. J Orthod, 2004, 31 ( 1 ) : 20 - 27.
2Ctmningham S J, Hunt N P. Quality of life and its importance in orthodontics[J]. J Orthod, 2001, 28(2):152-158.
3Allen P F . Assessment of oral health related quality of life[J]. Health Qual Life Outcomes,2003,1(1 ):40.
4Tang D T, Phillips C, Proffit W R, et al. Effect of quality of life measures on the decision to remove third molars in subjects with mild pericoronitis symptoms [ J ]. J Oral Maxillofac Surg,2014,72 (7) : 1235 - 1243.
5Kieffer J M , van Wijk A J , Ho J P , et al . The internal responsiveness of the Oral Health Impact Profile - 14 to detect differences in clinical parameters related to surgical third molar removal [ ] ]. Qual Life Res, 2012 , 21 ( 7 ) : 1241 - 1247.
6Matijevic M , Uzarevic Z , Ivanisevic Z , et al. Determi- ning the quality of life after removing of impacted lower wisdom tooth using the principal component analysis meth- od [ J ]. Coll Antropol, 2014,38 ( 2 ) : 691 - 699.
7Slade G D. Measuring oral health and quality of life[ M]. Chapel Hill : University of North Carolina, 1997.
8Koerner KR. The removal of impacted third molars- prin- ciples and procedures[J]. Dent Clin Noah Am. 1994, 38(2): 255-278.
9Winter G B. Principles of exodontia as applied to the im- pacted third molar[M]. St Louis:American Medical books, 1926.
10Rullo R, Addabbo F, Papaccio G,et al. Piezoelectric device vs. con-ventional rotative instruments in impacted third molar surgery: rela tionships between surgical difficuhy and postoperative pain with his tological evaluations[J]. J Craniomaxillofac Surg, 2013,41 (2): e33- 38. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2012.07.007.