期刊文献+

速效救心丸和麝香保心丸治疗冠心病心绞痛的经济性分析 被引量:4

Economic analysis of Suxiaojiuxin pills and Shexiangbaoxin pills in treatment of angina pectoris of coronary heart disease
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨速效救心丸和麝香保心丸治疗冠心病心绞痛的疗效与经济性。方法选择2016年1月至12月本院收治的冠心病心绞痛患者150例,采取随机数字表法将其分为A组与B组,每组75例;在常规治疗的基础上,A组采用速效救心丸治疗,B组采用麝香保心丸治疗;观察评价两组临床疗效,并分析药物成本效果。结果A组与B组临床总有效率(94.67%比96.00%)对比,差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05);A组与B组成本效果比(C/E)分别为1.10和1.27,以A组为参照,B组增量成本效果比(△C/△E)为13.38。结论速效救心丸和麝香保心丸治疗冠心病心绞痛疗效相当,但速效救心丸的经济性更佳,可使资源最优化,适于临床应用。 Objective To explore the efficacy and economy of Suxiaojiuxin pills and Shexiangbaoxin pills in the treatment of angina pectoris of coronary heart disease. Methods A total of 150 patients with angina pectoris treated at our hospital from January to December, 2016 were selected and randomly divided into group A and group B, 75 for each group. Both groups were routinely treated; in addition, group A were treated with Suxiaojiuxin pills and group B Shexiangbaoxin pills. The clinical efficacy of the two groups was observed and analyzed and the cost of the drug was analyzed. Results There was no statistical difference in the total effective rate between the two groups (P〉 0.05). The cost-effectiveness ratio (C/E) was 1.10 in group A and 1.27 in group B. With group A as the the reference, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (△C/△E) of group B was 13.38. Conclusion Suxiaojiuxin pills and Shexiangbaoxin pills are effective in treating coronary heart disease with angina pectoris, but Suxiaojiuxin pills are more economical and can be optimized for clinical use.
作者 董耿
出处 《国际医药卫生导报》 2018年第4期554-556,共3页 International Medicine and Health Guidance News
关键词 速效救心丸 麝香保心丸 冠心病 心绞痛 经济性 Suxiaojiuxin pills Shexiangbaoxin pills Coronary heart disease Angina Economics
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献99

共引文献80

同被引文献56

引证文献4

二级引证文献34

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部