期刊文献+

于家古村生态治水智慧的探究及其当代启示 被引量:15

A Study of Eco-Wisdom of Water Governance in the Yujia Ancient Village and its Contemporary Enlightenment
下载PDF
导出
摘要 历时数百年至今仍在有效运转的传统村落是我国传统生态治水智慧的鲜活载体,其具备的低技术、低成本、低冲击、适应式、复合化等特征恰恰正是现代海绵城市规划与设计所追求的目标之一。本文在进行"东西方哲学传统"、"城市与村落"和"传统村落生态治水智慧与现代城市雨洪管理体系"特征对比的基础上,以井陉于家古村为例,尝试从古代八大防洪方略的视角,解析北方传统村落的治水机制,并总结凝练其生态治水智慧的特点及古代治水知识体系。最后阐述将其应用于当代海绵城市建设的启示。 Traditional villages, wh^ch still function well after hundreds of years, are the Living embodiments of the traditional eco-wisdom of Chinese water management. They feature low technology, low cost. low impact, adaptability and multi-function, which are precisely the goals of sponge city planning and design. Based on the case stody of the Yujia ancient village and the feature comparisons involving "eastern and western philosophy", "city and village", and "eco-wisdom of water management in ancient villages and stormwater management system in modern cities", this paper attempts to analyze water management mechanism of northern traditional villages from the perspective of eight flood control strategies in ancient times and summarize the characteristics of eco-wisdom of water management in traditional villages and knowledge system of ancient water management. Finally, this paper presents the enlightenment of such eco-wisdom to the construction of modern sponge cities.
出处 《现代城市研究》 CSSCI 2018年第2期40-44,52,共6页 Modern Urban Research
基金 国家社会科学基金项目"我国北方传统村落生态治水智慧文化遗产的挖掘与保护研究"(编号:16BH130) 吉林省科技发展计划项目"寒地城市绿地空间海绵体提升机制研究"(20170101080JC) 吉林省社会科学基金项目"吉林省城市雨洪管理系统现状及发展对策研究"(编号:20168121)
关键词 海绵城芾 生态智慧 传统村藩 于家古村 古代治水知识体系 sponge city eco-wisdom traditional village Yujia ancient village knowledge system of ancient water management
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献25

  • 1[1]Kaufman, R.Strategic Planning Plus: An Organizational Guide[D]. Newbury Park, CA. 1992.
  • 2[2]Adam d. Koch.SWOT does not Need to be Recalled: It Needs to be Enhanced[D].Swinburne University of Technology, Australia 2000.
  • 3[3]Doug Leigh. Causal-Utility Decision Analysis(CUDA):Quantifying Swots[C]. Accepted for publication in 2000 Pfeiffer Annual. 1999.
  • 4[4]Marshall, S.Strategy Formulation SWOT Analysis Ndictment [Z/OL]. http//www.mindspring.com/steven Maishall/strategy.htm. 1999.
  • 5The Low Impact Development Design Group. Storm Water Management ModeI(SWMM) Analysis Report on Metro West[R]. Fairfax County, Virginia, 2005.
  • 6Chatfield, P. SUDS. SUDS-time to Get to Grips With It[A]. Conference of the Chartered Institution of Water and Environmental Management[C]. 2005.
  • 7Lloyd S. Clearwater Project: Community Acceptance of Water Sensitive Urban Design [A].Managing the Changing Colours of Water" Joint Seminar of the Australian Water Association and the Stormwater Industry Association of Victoria[C]. Melbourne, 2003.
  • 8Van Roon M R, Van Roon H T. Low Impact Urban Design and Development Principles for Assessment of Planning, Policy and Development Outcomes[A]. Working Paper 051, Centre for Urban Ecosystem Sustainability[C]. Auckland, 2005.
  • 9Tony H F Wong, Urban Design-the Journey Thus Far[J]. Environment Design Guide, 2007, (8): 1-10.
  • 10Pratt, C. J. Sustainable Drainage: A Review of Published Material on the Performance of Various SUDS Components [A]. Prepared for The Environment Agency [C]. UK, 2004.

共引文献60

同被引文献257

引证文献15

二级引证文献57

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部