期刊文献+

241例局部晚期中低位直肠癌术前同步放化疗联合TME根治术长期疗效分析 被引量:8

Long-term efficacy of preoperative chemoradiotherapy combined with total mesorectal excision for locally advanced rectal cancer: an analysis of 241 patients
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 回顾性分析 241例局部晚期中低位直肠癌行术前同步放化疗联合TME根治性手术的长期疗效以及影响预后因素。方法 2006—2014年中国医学科学院北京协和医学院肿瘤国家癌症中心连续收治经盆腔MRI或腹盆CT确诊的局部晚期中低位直肠腺癌患者 241例进行分析,该组患者术前盆腔放疗剂量 42.0-50.4 Gy (中位数50 Gy),同步化疗采用卡培他滨 ±奥沙利铂,于同步放化疗后 4-15周(中位数7周)接受TME原则的根治性手术(R0切除),术后均建议行辅助化疗,但需考虑患者恢复情况及意愿。Kaplan-Meier法计算DFS、LRR、DM及OS并Logrank法检验,Cox模型多因素分析。结果 全组患者中位随访42个月,3年LRR、DFS、OS和DM分别为3.8%、76.2%、85.9%和20.6%。亚组分析发现ypT0-2、ypN阴性、pCR、TRG4级患者可以获得更高的DFS (ypT0-2∶ypT3-4:86.0%∶69.3%,P=0.002;ypN阴性∶ypN阳性:88.1%∶56.9%,P=0.000;pCR∶非pCR:100%∶72.4%,P=0.001;TRG4级∶TRG2-3级∶TGR0-1级:94.9%∶73.6%∶66.3%,P=0.011),多因素分析结果显示术后ypN状态是影响DFS的因素(P=0.000)。结论 局部晚期中低位直肠癌行术前同步放化疗联合根治性手术局部区域控制较理想,远处转移是治疗失败的主要原因,放化疗后ypN状态是影响DFS的独立预后因素。 Objective To retrospectively analyze the long-term efficacy of and prognostic factors after preoperative chemoradiotherapy combined with total mesorectal excision (TME) in the treatment of 241 patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. Methods A total of 241 patients who were consecutively admitted to our hospital and diagnosed with locally advanced mid-low rectal adenocarcinoma by pelvic magnetic resonance imaging or computed tomography from January 2006 to November 2014 were enrolled as subjects. All patients received preoperative radiotherapy with doses ranging between 42.0 and 50.4 Gy (median dose=50 Gy) and concurrent chemotherapy with capecitabine±oxaliplatin. Patients received TME (R0 excision) at 4-15 weeks (median time=7 weeks) after chemoradiotherapy. Adjuvant postoperative chemotherapy was given depending on the recovery and preference of each patient. Disease-free survival (DFS), locoregional recurrence (LRR), overall survival (OS), and distant metastasis (DM) rates were calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method and analyzed by the log-rank test. The Cox model was used for multivariate analysis. Results In all the patients, the median follow-up time was 42 months;the 3-year LRR, DFS, OS, and DM rates were 3.8%, 76.2%, 85.9%, and 20.6%, respectively. The subgroup analysis showed that ypT0-2, ypN-, pCR, and TRG4 were associated with improved DFS (ypT0-2 vs. ypT3-4:86.0% vs. 69.3%, P=0.002;ypN-vs ypN+:88.1% vs. 56.9%, P=0.000;pCR vs. non-pCR:100% vs. 72.4%, P=0.001;TRG4 vs. TRG2-3 vs. TRG0-1:94.9% vs. 73.6% vs. 66.3%, P=0.011). The multivariate analysis revealed that the postoperative ypN status was an independent prognostic factor for DFS (P=0.000). Conclusions For patients with locally advanced mid-low rectal adenocarcinoma, preoperative chemoradiotherapy combined with radical surgery achieves satisfactory outcomes in local control. The major reason for treatment failure lies in distant metastasis. The ypN status after chemoradiotherapy is an independent prognostic factor for DFS.
出处 《中华放射肿瘤学杂志》 CSCD 北大核心 2018年第2期170-176,共7页 Chinese Journal of Radiation Oncology
基金 国家自然科学基金(81272510) 国家重点研发计划项目(2016YFC0904600)
关键词 直肠肿瘤/放化疗法 直肠肿瘤/外科学 预后 Rectal neoplasms/chemoradiotherapy Rectal neoplasms/surgery Prognosis
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献31

  • 1NCCN Clinical Practice Guideline in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines) Rectal Cancer Version 4.2013[DB/OL][2014-01-25].http://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_ gls/f_guidelines.asp.
  • 2Park JH,Yoon SM,Yu CS,et al.Randomized phase 3 trial comparing preoperative and postoperative chemoradiotherapy with capecitabine for locally advanced rectal cancer[J].Cancer,2011,117:3703-3712.
  • 3Roh MS,Colangelo LH,O' Connell MJ,et al.Preoperative multimodality therapy improves disease-free survival in patients with carcinoma of the rectum:NSABP R-03[J].J Clin Oncol,2009,27:5124-5130.
  • 4Sauer R,Becker H,Hohenberger W,et al.Preoperative versus postoperative chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer[J].N Engl J Med,2004,351:1731-1740.
  • 5Gerard JP,Azria D,Gourgou-Bourgade S,et al.Comparison of two neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy regimens for locally advanced rectal cancer:results of the phase Ⅲ trial ACCORD 12/0405-Prodige 2[J].J Clin Oncol,2010,28:1638-1644.
  • 6Aschele C,Cionini L,Lonardi S,et al.Primary tumor response to preoperative chemoradiation with or without oxaliplatin in locally advanced rectal cancer:pathologic results of the STAR-01randomized phase Ⅲ trial[J].J Clin Oncol,2011,29:2773-2780.
  • 7Rodel C,Liersch T,Becker H,et al.Preoperative chemoradiotherapy and postoperative chemotherapy with fluorouracil and oxaliplatin versus fluorouracil alone in locally advanced rectal cancer:initial results of the German CAO/ARO/AIO-04 randomised phase 3 trial[J].Lancet Oncol,2012,13:679-687.
  • 8Gerard JP,Azria D,Gourgou-Bourgade S,et al.Clinical outcome of the ACCORD 12/0405 PRODIGE 2 randomized trial in rectal cancer[J].J Clin Oncol,2012,30:4558-4565.
  • 9Roh MS,Yothers GA,O' Connell MJ,et al.The impact of capecitabine and oxaliplatin in the preoperative multimodality treatment in patients with carcinoma of the rectum:NSABP R-04[J].J Clin Oncol,2011,29 Suppl:abstr 3503.
  • 10Hans JS,Kim TH,Timothy JP,et al.Preoperative chemoradiotherapy and postoperative chemotherapy with capecitabine and oxaliplatin versus capecitabine alone in locally advanced rectal cancer:first results of the PETACC-6 randomized phase Ⅲ trial[J].J Clin Oncol,2013,31 Suppl:abstr 3531.

共引文献25

同被引文献89

引证文献8

二级引证文献31

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部