期刊文献+

国内外肿瘤放疗QA与QC的相关规范介绍 被引量:13

Introduction of relevant criteria for quality assurance and quality control of tumor radiotherapy at home and abroad
原文传递
导出
摘要 国内外多家机构制定和发布了关于放疗QA、QC的标准、指南、规范或报告。目前国内尚没有机构系统地开展此类工作。完整的放疗QA、QC规范体系应包含临床和物理技术两个方面,后者又包含设备、技术流程、辐射防护等内容物理技术方面的质量保证与质量控制对肿瘤放射治疗至关重要。本文拟对国内外关于放疗质控的规范进行介绍。 Multiple institutions at home and abroad have established and issued the standards, guidelines, criteria or reports of the quality assurance (QA) and quality control (QC) of radiotherapy. At present, no institutions in China have implemented systematic classification of QA-and QC-related criteria of radiotherapy. Complete standard system of QA and QC of radiotherapy should consist of clinical and physical technologies. Physical technology includes equipment, technological flow and radiation protection. The QA and QC of physical technology play a pivotal role in tumor radiotherapy. This paper introduces relevant criteria of QA and QC of radiotherapy at home and abroad.
出处 《中华放射肿瘤学杂志》 CSCD 北大核心 2018年第2期218-221,共4页 Chinese Journal of Radiation Oncology
关键词 肿瘤/放射疗法 质量保证 质量控制 Neoplasm/radiotherapy Quality assurance Quality control
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献37

  • 1Palmans H, Nafaa L, de Patoul N, et al. A dosimetry study comparing NCS report-5, IAEA TRS-381, AAPM TG-51 and IAEA TRS-398 in three clinical electron beam energies. Phys Med Biol, 2003, 48(9): 1091-1107.
  • 2Huq MS, Andreo P. Advances in the determination of absorbed dose to water in clinical high energy photon and electron beams using ionization chambers. Phys Med Biol, 2004, 49(4): 49-104.
  • 3Huq MS, Andreo P, Song HJ. Comparison of the IAEA TRS-398 and AAPM TG-51 absorbed dose to water protocols in the dosimetry of high-energy photon and electron beams. Phys Med Biol, 2001, 46(11): 2985-3006.
  • 4Andreo P, Huq MS, Westermark M, et al. Protocols for the dosimetry of high-energy photon and electron beams: a comparison of the IAEA TRS-398 and previous international codes of practice. Phys Med Biol, 2002, 47(17): 3033-3053.
  • 5Araki F, Kubo HD. Comparison of high-energy photon and electron dosimetry for various dosimetry protocols. Med Phys, 2002,29(5):857-868.
  • 6Fourie OL. Comparison of linear accelerator photon outputs from the IAEA TRS-398 and TRS-277 codes of practice. Australas Phys Eng Sci Med, 2008, 31(1): 24-31.
  • 7International Atomic Energy Agency. IAEA Technical Report Series No.277. Absorbed dose determination in photon and electron beams: an international code of practice. 2nd edition. Vienna: IAEA,1997:1-45.
  • 8International Atomic Energy Agency. IAEA Technical Report Series No.398. Absorbed dose determination in external beam radiotherapy: an international code of practice for dosimetry based on standards of absorbed dose to water. Vienna: IAEA,2006:1-229.
  • 9Palmans H, Nafaa L, De JJ, et al. Absorbed dose to water based dosimetry versus air kerma based dosimetry for high-energy photon beams: an experimental study. Phys Med Biol, 2002, 47(3): 421-440.
  • 10Ford EC ,Terezakis S. How safe is safe? Risk in radiotherapy [ J ]. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 2010, 78 ( 2 ) : 321-322. DOI: 10. lO16/j.ijrobp.2010.04.047.

共引文献15

同被引文献136

引证文献13

二级引证文献24

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部