康德图型法的必要性

The Necessity of Kant's Schematism

以斯密为代表的多数英美学者认为《纯粹理性批判》中图型法一章多余。赫费、盖耶尔和阿利松反对这种观点,他们各自提出了图型法的必要性的解释。这些辩护不是基于显象的非概念化前提,因此并不成功。《纯粹理性批判》第13节和图型法一章相关文本表明,显象的起源是非概念化的,异种难题包含形式和内容两方面。想象力的功能发挥只是消除范畴与显象形式上的异种性,没有消除内容上的异种性。图型法留下的这一难题对康德《遗著》的产生,对解释《纯粹理性批判》核心思想有重要意义。

Kemp Smith,Among others,thinks that the Schematism in Critique of Pure Reason is superfluous.Hoffe,Guyer and Allison against this and put forward interpretations to defend the necessity of Schematism.However,these interpretations is not success,because they are not grounded in this view,appearance is non-conceptualization.The texts in 13 section and the Schematism of Critique of Pure Reasonindicate that the arise of appearance is non-conceptualization,the heterogeneity of appearances and categories contain two aspect,formal and material.The function of imagination only resolve the formal heterogeneity of appearances and categories,not the material heterogeneity.The problem in Schematism is the motive which leads Kant to write Opus postumum,and is of great significance to interpret Critique of Pure Reason.