期刊文献+

陶渊明“神辨自然”生命哲学再探讨 被引量:11

Re-Exploration into Life Philosophy of “Spirit-Oriented Nature” of TAO Yuan-ming
下载PDF
导出
摘要 陶渊明的《形影神》组诗是其生命哲学的表述,包含着丰富的思辨性。陈寅恪、逯钦立两家分别从名教与自然及形神观这两种思想背景中寻求解释,标志现代学者对此问题的研究高度。唯以往研究,注重形影神三范畴内涵的分析,对组诗小序所示的"神辨自然"四字之真义,未有透彻的分析。其中包含多重思辨层次:首先,陶渊明将传统的形神相对的生命学说结构改造为"形""影""神"三个范畴,在此将魏晋流行的形神说与名教自然说两个思想脉络结合起来,并且将"神"从传统的生理、生命元素的概念,提升到一个包含着主体精神、最高理性内涵的哲学范畴;其次,陶渊明通过对形所代表的旧自然观的辨析,提出《神释》的新自然观,这一新自然观同时是针对东晋门阀名教与自然合一的主流的思想,显示出陶渊明对玄学自然观原旨的继承与发展。 "Form, Shadow and Spirit"written by TAO Yuan-ming is his expression of life philosophy with rich speculation. CHEN Yin-ke and LU Qin-li try to find explanation from the perspective of Confucian Ethical Code and concept of form and spirit, which reflects the level of study by modern scholars. Past study pays attention to the analysis of the connotation of form, shadow and spirit, but as for the essence of"Spirit-oriented nature"reflected in the preface of the series of poems, the analysis is not complete. There are many levels of speculation: first, the structure of life theory with the contradiction of form and spirit is changed into three fields of"form","shadow"and"spirit", which combines the popular theory of form and spirit in Wei and Jin Dynasty with the theory of nature of the Confucian Ethical Code."Spirit"is elevated into a philosophical field with subjective spirit and supreme rational connotation from traditional physiology and life elemental concept;secondly, through the analysis of old concept of nature represented by form, he proposes a new concept of nature with"Interpretation of Spirit", which is aimed at the integration of the Confucian Ethical Code with nature in east Jin Dynasty, and reflects inheritance and development of the essence of the metaphysical concept of nature by TAO Yuan-ming.
作者 钱志熙
机构地区 北京大学中文系
出处 《求是学刊》 CSSCI 北大核心 2018年第1期114-125,共12页 Seeking Truth
关键词 陶渊明 生命哲学 形神观 名教与自然 神辨自然 TAO Yuan-ming, life philosophy, concept of form and spirit, the Confucian Ethical Code with nature, Spirit-Oriented Nature
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献9

  • 1吴瞻泰.《陶诗汇注》卷二引,《陶渊明诗文汇评》,中华书局,1961年,第36页.
  • 2陈寅恪.《陶渊明之思想与清谈之关系》,见《金明馆丛稿初编》,第2f&,北京:生活·读书·新知三联书店,2009,页202.
  • 3马璞《陶诗本义》卷二清与善堂刊本.转引自:《陶渊明资料汇编》下册,北京:中华书局1962年版,第36页.
  • 4干宝:《晋纪总论》,见萧统编、李善注《文选》卷四十九,上册,北京:中华书局1977年版,第692页.
  • 5干宝:《晋纪总论》,李善注引王隐《晋书》,《文选》卷四十九,第692页.
  • 6《诸子集成》第3册,郭庆藩:《庄子集释》,第49页.
  • 7《诸子集成》第3册,张湛注《列子》卷一,第7页.
  • 8佚名《莲社高贤传》,《五朝小说大观》卷五,上海:上海文艺出版社1991年版,第145页.
  • 9温汝能:《陶诗汇评》卷二,转引自《陶渊明研究资料汇编》下册,第38页.

共引文献21

同被引文献45

引证文献11

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部