摘要
目前,全美35个州和哥伦比亚特区确立了道歉法;在澳大利亚,6个州和2个领地已制定了道歉法。世界各国在制定道歉法过程中虽然仍面临诸多问题,但在医疗纠纷解决中的推进非常迅速。分析了道歉法在医疗纠纷解决中的三大特有作用,启示我国采取完全豁免的道歉法规定,诚恳面对医疗过失,并借由事故真相的公开,深挖制度性根源,以避免类似事件的再次发生,最终达到提升医院医疗安全质量的目的。
At present, 35 states and the District of Columbia have established apologies laws in America; in Australia, six states and two territories have enacted apologies law. Although various countries in the word still face many problems in the process of formulating apologies laws, its promotion in the settlement of medical disputes is very rapid. The paper point out three unique roles of apologies laws in medical dispute settlement, enlightening our country to take apology law of absolute immunity, sincerely face medical negligence and dig out the institutional roots by the disclosure of the truth of the accident, in order to avoid the recurrence of similar incidents, and finally achieve the purpose of improving the quality of hospital medical safety.
出处
《中国医学伦理学》
2018年第1期10-14,共5页
Chinese Medical Ethics
基金
山西省哲学社会科学研究项目"建立院内促进式医疗纠纷调解模式的研究"(项目编号:2016054015)
广东省医学科学技术研究基金项目"叙事调解理论下广东省医疗纠纷院内调解机制实证研究"(A2015570)
山西大学第十五期本科生科研训练计划资助项目阶段性成果
关键词
道歉法
医疗纠纷
高语境文化
完全道歉
部分道歉
Apologies Laws
Medical Disputes
High- Context Culture
Full Apology
Partial Apology