两组不同无创正压通气方式对早产儿呼吸窘迫综合征的治疗效果

Two different non invasive positive pressure ventilation in the treatment of premature infants with respiratory distress syndrome

目的:探讨不同无创正压通气方式对早产儿呼吸窘迫综合征的治疗效果。方法:收治早产儿呼吸窘迫综合征患者62例,随机分为观察组(双相经鼻持续气道正压通气)和对照组(经鼻持续气道正压通气),各31例。对比两组患者有创呼吸支持率和并发症发生率。结果:观察组有创呼吸支持率显著低于对照组(P<0.05)。结论:双相经鼻持续气道正压通气不仅能很好地降低早产儿呼吸窘迫综合征患者的有创呼吸支持率,且并发症发生率也不高。

Objective：To investigate the effect of different non invasive positive pressure ventilation in the treatment of premature infants with respiratory distress syndrome.Methods：62 cases of premature infants with respiratory distress syndrome were randomly divided into the observation group（with biphasic nasal continuous positive airway pressure） and the control group（with nasal continuous positive airway pressure）,with 31 cases in each group.Then the incidence of invasive respiratory support and incidence of complications in two groups were compared.Results：The invasive respiratory support rate in the observation group was significantly lower than that in the control group（P0.05）.Conclusion：Biphasic nasal continuous positive airway pressure can not only reduce the invasive respiratory support rate of premature infants with respiratory distress syndrome,but also has a low incidence of complications.