经尿道前列腺等离子体电切术与剜除术治疗前列腺增生分析被引量：4

Transurethral plasmakinetic resection and enucleation for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia

下载PDF

导出

摘要目的:探讨经尿道前列腺等离子体电切术与剜除术治疗前列腺增生的效果。方法:收治前列腺增生患者46例,随机分成等离子体电切术(PKRP)组和剜除术(PKEP)组,各23例。PKRP组采取等离子双极汽化系统,PKEP组采取等离子体电气化仪,将增生的前列腺腺体剜除。结果:PKEP组手术时间、术中出血量、前列腺切除重量、膀胱冲洗时间、导尿管留置时间和术后住院时间明显优于PKRP组(P<0.05)。结论:PKRP和PKEP均是治疗前列腺增生的重要术式,PKEP治疗手术时间更短、出血更少,是治疗前列腺增生较为理想的术式。 Objective：To investigate the transurethral plasmakinetic resection and enucleation for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia effect.Methods：46 cases with benign prostatic hyperplasia were selected.They were randomly divided into the plasmakinetic resection group and the enucleation group with 23 cases in each.The group PKRP adopted plasmakentic vaporization system,while the PKEP group took plasma vaporization,and prostate gland hyperplasia enucleation.Results：The operative time,intraoperative blood loss,prostatectomy weight,bladder irrigation time,catheter indwelling time and postoperative hospitalization time in the PKEP group were significantly lower than those in the PKRP group（P0.05）.Conclusion：Both the PKRP and PKEP are important surgical procedures for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia.PKEP has shorter operative time and less bleeding.It is an ideal operative way for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia.

作者周小东兰志恒 Zhou Xiaodong;Lan Zhiheng(The People＇s Hospital of Changji City,Xinjiang 831100）Objective：Toinvestigatethetransurethralplasmakin)

机构地区新疆昌吉市人民医院

出处《中国社区医师》 2018年第5期74-74,77,共2页 Chinese Community Doctors

关键词前列腺增生症等离子体电切术剜除术 Prostatichyperplasia Plasmaelectrocision Enucleation

分类号 R699.8 [医药卫生—泌尿科学]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献1

1张立卿,徐建江,刘仰东,张金华.经尿道前列腺等离子体双极电切术治疗良性前列腺增生的疗效和安全性分析[J].国际泌尿系统杂志,2012,32(2):196-199. 被引量：11

二级参考文献10

1Kuntz RM. Current role of lasers in the treatment of benign prosta- tic hyperplasia (BPH). Eur Urol, 2006, 49(6):961 -969.
2Kumar SM. Rapid communication : holmium laser ablation of large prostate glands: an endourologic alternative to open prostatectomy. J Endourol, 2007, 21 (6) :659 - 662.
3Patel A, Adshead JM. First clinical experience with new transure- thral bipolar prostate electrosurgery resection system: controlled tissue ablation(coblation technology). J Endourol, 2004, 18 (10) :959 -964.
4Mamoulakis C, Trompetter M, de la Rosette J. Bipolar transure- thral resection of the prostate: the "golden standard" reclaims its leading position. Curt Opin Urol, 2009, 19 (1) :26 -32.
5Iofi F, Franco G, Leonardo C, et al. Bipolar transurethral resec- tion of prostate: clinical and urodynamic evaluation. Urology, 2008, 71(2) :252 -255.
6Patankar S, Jamkar A, Dobhada S, et al. PlasmaKinetic Super- pulse transurethral resection versus conventional transurethral re- section of prostate. J Endourol, 2006, 20(3) :215 -219.
7Seckiner I, YesiUi C, Akduman B, et al. A prospective random- ized study for comparing bipolar plasmakinetic resection of the prostate with standard TURP. Urol Int, 2006, 76(2) :139 - 143.
8Donovan JL, Peters T J, Neal DE, et al. A randomized trial com- paring transurethral resection of the prostate, laser therapy and conservative treatment of men with symptoms associated with be- nign prostatic enlargement: The CLasP study. J Urol, 2000, 164 (1) :65 -70.
9Tefeldi A, Muslumanoglu AY, Baykal M, et al. A hybrid tech- nique using bipolar energy in transurethral prostate surgery: a pro- spective, randomized comparison. J Urol, 2005, 174(4 Pt 1 ): 1339 - 1343.
10Eaton AC, Francis RN. The provision of transurethral prostatecto- my on a day - case basis using bipolar plasma kinetic technology. BJU Int,2002,89(6) :534 -537.