期刊文献+

基于权力感知调节作用的领导对员工谏言反应研究 被引量:8

The Effect of Supervisors' Response to Employee Voice:The Moderating Effect of Sense of Power
下载PDF
导出
摘要 通过276份领导与员工配对样本的问卷调查,从社会认知理论角度,分别探讨领导谏言反应在员工谏言行为同员工谏言效能感和情感承诺两个变量之间的中介作用,并分析了领导权力感知在其中的调节作用。研究结果表明,员工谏言行为对员工谏言效能感及情感承诺有正向影响,领导谏言反应有显著的中介效应。此外,领导的权力感知在员工谏言行为与领导谏言反应之间有显著的调节作用;领导权力感知与员工谏言行为的交互作用对员工谏言效能感有显著影响,但对情感承诺的影响不显著。 This research is based on social cognition theory with data from a sample of 276 subordinate-supervisor dyads, starting from the employee advice which is on the action level. Supervisors' response to voice is taken as mediator, and voice efficacy and affective commitment as the dependent variables, and the sense of power as the moderator variable. The results show that the employee voice behavior has a positive influence on voice efficacy and affeetive commitment, the role supervisors' response to voice has a significant mediation effect. The interaction of supervisor's sense of power and employee voice behavior has a positive influence on voice efficacy, and it doesn't have a positive influ- ence on affective commitment.
出处 《管理学报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2018年第2期209-216,共8页 Chinese Journal of Management
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(71672053) 国家社会科学基金资助项目(14BGL199) 教育部人文社会科学基金资助项目(17YJC790153) 湖北省科技计划资助项目(2016ADC012)
关键词 领导谏言反应 员工谏言行为 权力感知 谏言效能感 情感承诺 supervisors' response to voice employee voice behavior sense of power voice efficacy affective commitment
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献250

  • 1马剑虹,倪陈明.企业职工的工作价值观特征分析[J].应用心理学,1998,4(1):10-14. 被引量:39
  • 2陆昌勤,凌文辁,方俐洛.管理自我效能感与一般自我效能感的关系[J].心理学报,2004,36(5):586-592. 被引量:84
  • 3段锦云,钟建安.组织中的进谏行为[J].心理科学,2005,28(1):69-71. 被引量:99
  • 4温忠麟,张雷,侯杰泰.有中介的调节变量和有调节的中介变量[J].心理学报,2006,38(3):448-452. 被引量:733
  • 5Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • 6Bakker, A. B., Hakanen, J. J., Demerouti, E., & Xanthopoulou, D. (2007). Job resources boost work engagement, particularly when job demands are high. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(2), 274-284.
  • 7Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  • 8Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173-1182.
  • 9Burris, E. R. (in press). The risks and rewards of speaking up: Managerial responses to employee voice. Academy of Management Journal.
  • 10Chiaburu~ D. S., Marinova, S. V., & van Dyne, L. (2008). Should I do it or not? An initial model of cognitive processes predicting voice behaviors. In L. T. Kane & M. R Poweller (Eds.), Citizenship in the 21st century (pp. 127-153). New York: Nova Science Publishers.

共引文献470

同被引文献51

引证文献8

二级引证文献53

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部