摘要
学术话语是一个学科的内在架构。学术话语生成和建构的自主性直接影响到学科的自主性。在建构中国学术话语体系的时代要求下,中国课程学术话语却陷入本土失语、学科失语和实践失语的困境。本文尝试透过历史分析的视角,从实践理性、学术依附和权威主义性格等方面分析影响中国课程学术话语自主建构的因素,并以坚守课程学科的基本立场、明确学术话语的言说规范、掌握课程研究的主动权作为破解失语困境的可能路径。
Academic discourse is the internal framework of a discipline. The autonomy of the formation and construction of academic discourse directly influences the autonomy of the subject. Under the request of the construction of Chinese academic discourse system, the academic discourse of Chinese curriculum has fallen into the predicament of local aphasia, discipline aphasia and practical aphasia. Through the historical perspective, this paper analyzes the factors that influence the independent construction of Chinese curriculum academic discourse from the aspects of the practical reason, the academic attachment and the authoritative personality. It is possible to break out the dilemma of aphasia by adhering to the basic position of curriculum discipline, standardizing the object of curriculum research and grasping the initiative of the research.
出处
《课程.教材.教法》
CSSCI
北大核心
2018年第3期44-49,共6页
Curriculum,Teaching Material and Method
基金
教育部人文社科2014年度青年基金项目"我国中小学体育课程的百年变迁研究(1912-2012)"(14YJC880036)
关键词
课程学术话语
自主建构
失语
curriculum academic discourse
independent construction
aphasia