期刊文献+

场景恐惧记忆泛化小鼠海马CA1区AMPA受体及NMDA受体亚基表达变化 被引量:1

Altered expression of AMPAR and NMDAR subunits in hippocampal CA1 area with contextual fear memory generalization in mice
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨小鼠在场景恐惧记忆泛化过程中海马CA1区AMPA受体及NMDA受体亚基表达水平变化情况。方法8周龄雄性C57BL/6小鼠共35只,随机选择7只作为蛋白测定对照组(Naive组),无需进行行为学训练与测试;另28只小鼠进行场景恐惧训练和场景转化测试,并根据测试结果分成未泛化组和泛化组;完成测试后处死小鼠,提取海马CA1区蛋白,Western blot检测AMPA受体亚基GluR1、GluR2及NMDA受体亚基NR1、NR2A及NR2B表达情况。结果(1)经历同一强度应激后,7只小鼠(区分率:0.52±0.08)出现场景恐惧记忆泛化,余21只(区分率:0.75±0.07)未出现场景恐惧记忆泛化(P〈0.01),但两组小鼠在场景记忆获得过程僵住反应时间百分比差异无统计学意义。(2)AMPA受体亚基GluR1、GluR2表达在Naive组、未泛化组、泛化组中差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05)。(3)NMDA受体NR1表达在三组中差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05);NR2A亚基表达在未泛化组(1.11±0.20)、泛化组(1.09±0.20)中差异无统计学意义,但二者较Naive组(0.95±0.17)均显著上升(P〈0.05);NR2B亚基表达在Naive组(0.83±0.19)、未泛化组(0.80±0.14)中差异无统计学意义,但泛化组(1.05±0.17)中较该两组均显著上升(P〈0.05);NR2A/NR2B未泛化组(1.23±0.25)较Naive组(0.89±0.31)和泛化组(0.86±0.17)均显著上升(P〈0.05)。结论(1)同一应激强度下仅部分个体出现场景恐惧记忆泛化,且此种泛化情况与场景恐惧记忆获得过程无关。(2)海马CA1区AMPA受体亚基GluR1、GluR2表达在泛化过程中未见明显差异;而NMDA受体亚基表达主要表现为NR2B表达增加,NR2A/NR2B比值下降;由此引起的突触可塑性改变可能是恐惧记忆泛化形成的机制之一。 ObjectiveTo investigate the alteration of subunit expression of AMPAR and NMDAR in hippocampal CA1 area of mice with contextual fear memory generalization.Methods35 male C57BL/6 mice, aged 8 weeks, were involved in the experiment.Seven mice were randomly selected as the naive group, which didn't receive the behavioral training.28 mice experienced the context fear conditioning and contextual shift task were divided into generalization group and non generalization group according to the result.Then Western blot was used to measure the expression of AMPAR and NMDAR subunits in CA1 in the naive group, non generalization group and generalization group.Results(1)Seven mice (discrimination ratio: 0.52±0.08) showed contextual generalization when undergoing the same stress level, while the other 21 mice (discrimination ratio: 0.75±0.07) didn’t (P〈0.01), however, these two group showed similar freezing(%) in the memory acquisition process.(2)The subunit composition of AMPA receptors had no significant difference in CA1 area among the Naive group, non generalization group and generalization group(P〉0.05). (3)NR1 subunit was similar in the three groups(P〉0.05). NR2A expression was significantly increased in the non generalization group(1.11±0.20) and generalization group (1.09±0.20 ) compared with that in the naive group(0.95±0.17) (both P〈0.05). The expression of NR2B was significantly increased in generalization group(1.05±0.17) compared with that in the naive group(0.83±0.19) and non generalization group(0.80±0.14 )(both P〈0.05). The ratio of NR2A/NR2B was significantly increased in non generalization group(1.23±0.25) compared with that in the naive group(0.89±0.31) and generalization group (0.86±0.17)(both P〈0.05).Conclusion(1)Only part of the individuals show contextual fear memory generalization after the same stress, and this contextual generalization progress is not related to the acquisition of context fear memory.(2)There is no significant change in expression of AMPAR subunits in CA1 of mice with the contextual generalization.The rise of NR2B and the decline of ratio of NR2A/NR2B are the main changes, suggesting that consequently the alternation of synaptic plasticity maybe one of the mechanisms of contextual fear memory generalization.
出处 《中华行为医学与脑科学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2018年第1期2-6,共5页 Chinese Journal of Behavioral Medicine and Brain Science
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(81273350)
关键词 场景恐惧记忆 泛化 AMPA受体 NMDA受体 Contextual fear memory Generalization AMPA receptors NMDA receptors
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献26

  • 1张红梅,李义召,王凤山,程艳娜,夏作理.LMWH-SOD对沙土鼠全脑缺血再灌注后TNF-a表达的影响[J].中国医师杂志,2006,8(11):1456-1458. 被引量:2
  • 2牛敬忠,杨明峰,岳伟.低氧预适应增强小鼠学习记忆能力[J].泰山医学院学报,2006,27(8):694-696. 被引量:2
  • 3张颜波,吕国蔚,杨明峰,王轩,孙保亮,牛敬忠.低氧预适应小鼠海马Bcl-2表达和Caspase-3活性的变化[J].中华神经科杂志,2007,40(8):553-555. 被引量:9
  • 4Yule W. Posttraumatic stress disorder in children and adolescents. Int Rev Psychiatry,2001,13:194-200.
  • 5Liu XX, Yang YF, Yuan P, et al. A study for the relationship between mental health and abnormity of menstruation for middle school girl students in Wenchuan earthquake-stricken. Biosci Trends ,2010,4:4-8.
  • 6American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. 5th ed. Washington DC: American Psychiatric Association, 1994 : 427-429.
  • 7Goenjian AK, Walling D, Steinberg AM, et al. A Prospective Study of Posttraumatic Stress and Depressive Reactions Among Treatedand Untreated Adolescents 5 Years After a Catastrophic Disaster. Am J Psychiatry,2005,162: 2302-2308.
  • 8Wang X, Gao L, Shinfuku N, et al. Longitudinal study of earthquake related PTSD in a randomly selected community sample in North China. Am J Psychiatry,2000,157 : 1260-1266.
  • 9Perkonigg A, Pfister H, Stein MB, et al. Longitudinal course of posttraumatic stress disorder and posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms in a community sample of adolescents and young adults. Am J Psychiatry ,2005,162 : 1320-1327.
  • 10Liu ZY, Yang YF, Ye YL, et al. One-year follow-up study of post- traumatic stress disorder among adolescents following the Wen- Chuan earthquake in China. Bioscience Trends,2010,4:96-102.

共引文献6

同被引文献1

引证文献1

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部