期刊文献+

精神分裂症和抑郁症患者自我反思与洞察力水平及特征研究 被引量:15

The ability and characteristic of self-reflection and insight in schizophrenia and depression patients
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨精神分裂症患者与抑郁症患者的自我反思与洞察力水平及其特点。方法运用自我反思与洞察力量表(The Self-Reflection and Insight Scale,SRIS)对方便选取的精神分裂症组(140例),抑郁症组(92例)与健康对照组(131例)的自我反思与洞察力水平进行测试,同时进行多伦多述情障碍量表(Toronto Alexithymia Scale-20,TAS-20)评估。结果(1)精神分裂症组和抑郁症组的SRIS总分[(73.51±12.78)分、(79.94±11.11)分]、自我反思(RE)[(42.08±10.95)分、(47.48±9.19)分]、洞察力(IN)[(31.43±4.92)分、(32.46±5.70)分]低于健康对照组[(86.84±12.70)分、(51.73±9.95)分、(35.11±5.48)分],均差异有统计学意义(均P〈0.05) 。(2)精神分裂症组SRIS总分[(73.51±12.78)分]、RE[(42.08±10.95)分]低于抑郁症组SRIS总分[(79.94±11.11)分]、RE[(47.48±9.19)分],均差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05);但精神分裂症组与抑郁症组的洞察力因子得分差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05)。(3)精神障碍患者组TAS-20量表得分与RE得分(r=-0.227,P〈0.05)、IN得分(r=-0.538,P〈0.01)呈显著相关性。结论精神障碍患者存在自我反思及洞察力方面不同程度的损伤,抑郁症患者比精神分裂症患者在自我反思方面的受损程度低。 ObjectiveTo investigate the ability of the self-reflection and insight in schizophrenia and depression patients and their characteristics.MethodsSelf-reflection and insight scale (SRIS) and the toronto alexithymia scale-20(TAS-20)were used to test the self-reflection and insight of 140 schizophrenia patients, 92 depression patients and 131 healthy controls.Results(1)The SRIS score((73.51±12.78), (79.94±11.11)), self-reflection(RE) score ((42.08±10.95), (47.48±9.19)) and insight(IN) score((31.43±4.92), (32.46±5.70)) in schizophrenia and depression patients were significantly lower than those in healthy controls (SRIS score(86.84±12.70), RE score(51.73±9.95), IN score(35.11±5.48)), and the differences were statistically significant(P〈0.05). (2)The SRIS score(73.51±12.78) and RE score(42.08±10.95) in schizophrenia group were significantly lower than those in depression group ((79.94±11.11), (47.48±9.19)), and the differences were statistically significant (P〈0.05); but the scores of insight factors had no difference between schizophrenia group and depression group (P〉0.05). (3) The correlation between TAS-20 score and RE score (r=-0.227, P〈0.05) and IN score (r=-0.538, P〈0.01) was statistically significant in patients with mental disorder.ConclusionPatients with mental disorder have different levels of self-reflection and insight impairment. Patients with depression suffer from a lower degree of self-reflection than schizophrenia patients.
作者 刘露 刘健
出处 《中华行为医学与脑科学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2018年第1期31-34,共4页 Chinese Journal of Behavioral Medicine and Brain Science
基金 浙江省科技厅公益类项目(2013C33095) 杭州市科技局医学重点专科专病专项基金项目(20120533Q14)
关键词 自我反思 洞察力 精神分裂症 抑郁症 Self-reflection Insight Schizophrenia Depressive disorder
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献46

  • 1司继伟,张庆林.自我意识的心理学研究理论进展[J].西南师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),1999,31(3):63-68. 被引量:12
  • 2彭晓哲,周晓林.情绪信息与注意偏向[J].心理科学进展,2005,13(4):488-496. 被引量:118
  • 3陈俊,刘海燕,张积家.Stroop效应研究的新进展——理论、范式及影响因素[J].心理科学,2007,30(2):415-418. 被引量:51
  • 4Taylor G J. Recent developments in alexithymia theory and research. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 2000, 45 (2) : 134 - 142.
  • 5William Frawley, Raoul N. Smith. A processing theory of alexithymia. Journal of Cognitive Systems Research, 2001, 2(3): 189-206.
  • 6Lars-Gunnar Lundh, Margareta Simonsson-Sarnecki. Alexithymia and cognitive bias for emotional information. Personality and Individual Differences. 2002,32 (6) : 1063 - 1075.
  • 7Bagby R M, Parker J D A, Taylor G J. The Twenty- Item Toronto Alexithymia Scale. I; Item selection and cross-validation of the factor structure. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 1994, 38- 23 - 32.
  • 8Bagby R M, Taylor G J, Parker J D A. The Twenty- Item Toronto Alexithymia Scale. II : Convergent, discriminant, and concurrent validity. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 1994, 38:33 - 40.
  • 9Parker J D A, Taylor G J, Bagby R M. The 20-Item Toronto Alexithymia Scale III. Reliability and factorial validity in a community population. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 2003, 55:269-275.
  • 10Taylor G J, Bagby R M, Parker J D A. The 20-Item Toronto Alexithymia Scale IV. Reliability and factorial validity in different languages and cultures. Journal of Psychosomatic Research ,2003, 55 : 277 - 283.

共引文献27

同被引文献132

引证文献15

二级引证文献107

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部