摘要
流行的死亡标准是全脑死亡标准和脑干死亡标准。然而随着脑科学的发展,全脑死亡标准和脑干死亡标准已不足以说明死亡的含义。通过分析流行的死亡标准可以看到,无论在理论还是实践上,全脑死亡标准和脑干死亡标准都面临着根本的困难。基于个人同一性的理论视角,脑半球死亡与新皮层死亡是可以得到合理哲学辩护的死亡标准。
The whole-brain death and the brain-stem death are the two prevailing death criteria. However,as the studies on brain science continues,the whole-brain death and the brain-stem death are inadequate to illustrate the implications of death of our kind. I argue that my analysis on the prevailing death criteria is enough to present the difficulties of the whole-brain death as well as the brain-stem death. Based on the theory of personal identity,I propose that the alternative death criteria that can be philosophically justified are hemispheric death and neocortical death.
出处
《自然辩证法研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2018年第2期20-25,共6页
Studies in Dialectics of Nature
关键词
全脑死亡
脑干死亡
有机体
脑半球
新皮层
whole - brain death
brain - stem death
organism
cerebral hemispheres
cerebral neocortex