期刊文献+

脑死亡标准辨析——基于个人同一性理论的考察 被引量:2

Discriminating the Death Criteria:An Analysis Based on the Theory of Personal Identity
原文传递
导出
摘要 流行的死亡标准是全脑死亡标准和脑干死亡标准。然而随着脑科学的发展,全脑死亡标准和脑干死亡标准已不足以说明死亡的含义。通过分析流行的死亡标准可以看到,无论在理论还是实践上,全脑死亡标准和脑干死亡标准都面临着根本的困难。基于个人同一性的理论视角,脑半球死亡与新皮层死亡是可以得到合理哲学辩护的死亡标准。 The whole-brain death and the brain-stem death are the two prevailing death criteria. However,as the studies on brain science continues,the whole-brain death and the brain-stem death are inadequate to illustrate the implications of death of our kind. I argue that my analysis on the prevailing death criteria is enough to present the difficulties of the whole-brain death as well as the brain-stem death. Based on the theory of personal identity,I propose that the alternative death criteria that can be philosophically justified are hemispheric death and neocortical death.
作者 王帅
机构地区 北京大学哲学系
出处 《自然辩证法研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2018年第2期20-25,共6页 Studies in Dialectics of Nature
关键词 全脑死亡 脑干死亡 有机体 脑半球 新皮层 whole - brain death brain - stem death organism cerebral hemispheres cerebral neocortex
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献3

  • 1帕菲特,2005年.《理与人》,上海译文出版社.
  • 2Schick & Vaughn, Doing Philosophy: An Introduction through Thought Experiments( 2nd Ed. ), The McGraw-Hill Company, 2003, p. 252; p. 256, p. 259, p. 260, p. 270, p. 272, p. 268.
  • 3Sydney Shoemaker, "Persons and Their Pasts", American Philosophical Quarterly, 7 (4), 1970, pp. 269 - 285.

共引文献3

同被引文献17

引证文献2

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部