摘要
2013年《中华人民共和国商标法》明确规定了商标宣告无效程序,并保留了当事人对商标宣告无效决定(裁定)的司法审查权。在认定商标宣告无效的司法审查应属"行政诉讼"的基础上,针对行政诉讼引发的循环诉讼、无法实质解决纠纷的现实问题,《最高人民法院关于审理商标授权确权行政案件若干问题的规定》立足于商标宣告无效司法审查的特殊性,准许法院在特定情形下不予受理,但并未赋予法院有限的司法变更权,应坚持《最高人民法院关于审理商标授权确权行政案件若干问题的规定(征求意见稿)》,赋予法院有限司法变更权。
In 2013, the Trademark Law stipulated "declaring nullity to registered trademarks", and gave the party the right of judicial review. On the basis of the "administrative litigation", the administrative litigation can lead to circling litigation, but can' t solve the real problem of the dispute. Based on the special nature of the judicial re- view of the trademark declaration, the Administrative Trials regarding Trademark Approval and Validity of the P. R. C Supreme People's Court allows the court to be inadmissible under certain circumstances, but does not give the court a limited right of judicial change. The Administrative Trials regarding Trademark Approval and Validity of the P. R. C Supreme People's Court (Draft for Seeking Public Opinions) has given the court limited judicial changes.
出处
《镇江高专学报》
2018年第1期60-63,共4页
Journal of Zhenjiang College
关键词
司法审查
行政诉讼
不予受理
有限司法变更权
judicial review
administrative litigation
refusal of accept
limited judicial change right