期刊文献+

论商标宣告无效的司法审查——兼评《最高人民法院关于审理商标授权确权行政案件若干问题的规定》第28,30条

Judicial review of trademark invalidation——Comments on Article 28,30 of The Rules on the Administrative Trials regarding Trademark Approval and Validity of the P. R. C Supreme People's Court
下载PDF
导出
摘要 2013年《中华人民共和国商标法》明确规定了商标宣告无效程序,并保留了当事人对商标宣告无效决定(裁定)的司法审查权。在认定商标宣告无效的司法审查应属"行政诉讼"的基础上,针对行政诉讼引发的循环诉讼、无法实质解决纠纷的现实问题,《最高人民法院关于审理商标授权确权行政案件若干问题的规定》立足于商标宣告无效司法审查的特殊性,准许法院在特定情形下不予受理,但并未赋予法院有限的司法变更权,应坚持《最高人民法院关于审理商标授权确权行政案件若干问题的规定(征求意见稿)》,赋予法院有限司法变更权。 In 2013, the Trademark Law stipulated "declaring nullity to registered trademarks", and gave the party the right of judicial review. On the basis of the "administrative litigation", the administrative litigation can lead to circling litigation, but can' t solve the real problem of the dispute. Based on the special nature of the judicial re- view of the trademark declaration, the Administrative Trials regarding Trademark Approval and Validity of the P. R. C Supreme People's Court allows the court to be inadmissible under certain circumstances, but does not give the court a limited right of judicial change. The Administrative Trials regarding Trademark Approval and Validity of the P. R. C Supreme People's Court (Draft for Seeking Public Opinions) has given the court limited judicial changes.
作者 祁雯雯
出处 《镇江高专学报》 2018年第1期60-63,共4页 Journal of Zhenjiang College
关键词 司法审查 行政诉讼 不予受理 有限司法变更权 judicial review administrative litigation refusal of accept limited judicial change right
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献15

共引文献34

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部