期刊文献+

强制阐释与本体批评范式——对新批评文本中心论的反思 被引量:2

Forced Interpretation and Ontological Criticism Paradigm——Reflections on the Text-centered Theory of New Criticism
下载PDF
导出
摘要 文本中心是包括英美新批评在内的西方形式文论的基调,它以文学性为逻辑起点,以文学语言的细读为基本操作方法,创设出一系列影响深远的批评话语。但是,文本批评不等于文学批评,从这个意义上说,"文学是语言的艺术"这一看似"永恒"的真理却成为"强制阐释"症候群中对语言学过度依赖的"场外征用"。文本中心论所导致的唯文本阐释倾向,在割裂作者与文本的先在联系中丧失了意义阐释维度的丰富性。在呼应强制阐释论基础上重建另一种"本体阐释",除了还原文学世界的丰富多彩而外,还应包含反抗理论霸权的价值诉求。 Text centrality is the keynote of western formal literary theory including the New Criticism,which takes literariness as the logical beginning and literary language reading as the basic operation method. It has created a series of far-reaching critic discourses,however,text criticism is not equal to literary criticism. In this sense,the seemingly"eternal"truth that"literature is the art of language"has become the"extrinsic expropriation"of over-reliance on linguistics in the syndrome of"forced interpretation". The tendency of the text-only interpretation caused by text-centered theory loses the richness in meaning-interpretation dimension as cutting off the original connection between the author and the text. The reconstruction of"ontology interpretation"on the basis of opposing forced interpretation should not only be able to restore the rich and colorful literary world,but also contain the value of resisting theoretical hegemony.
作者 韩清玉 苏昕
出处 《华南师范大学学报(社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2018年第1期162-169,192,共8页 Journal of South China Normal University:Social Science Edition
基金 中国博士后科学基金特别资助项目(2017T100483) 安徽大学哲学系"固本强基"开放课题基金项目"当代美学视域中艺术与美的关系研究"
关键词 强制阐释 本体阐释 语言学 场外征用 文学世界 forced interpretation ontology interpretation linguistics extrinsic expropriation literary world
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献85

  • 1支宇,罗淑珍.西方文论在汉语经验中的话语变异──关于韦勒克“内部研究”的辨析[J].外国文学研究,2001,23(4):15-22. 被引量:10
  • 2朱立元主编.《当代西方文艺理论》,上海:华东师范大学出版社,2007年,第341页.
  • 3本尼特,罗伊尔.《关键词:文学、批评与理论导论》,汪正龙、李永新译,广西师范大学出版社,2007,第137页.
  • 4汤因比.《历史研究》,上海人民出版社2005年版,第19页.
  • 5《马克思恩格斯文集》第1卷,人民出版社2009年版第52页.
  • 6Paul de Man, The Resistance to Theory (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1986), p. 7.
  • 7Roman Seldon and Peter Widowson, A Reader Guide's to Contemporary Literary Theory (Lexingtong: University Press of Kentucky, 1993), p. 104.
  • 8Alien Schauber and Allen Spolsky, The Bounds of Interpretation : Linguistic Theory and Literary Text (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1986), p. 2.
  • 9Richard Rorty, ed. , The Linguistic Turn (Chicago: University Press, 1967, 1992), p. 373.
  • 10Ludwig Wittgenstein, Tractatus logico-philosophicus (London: Routledge, 1961), p. 68.

共引文献525

同被引文献15

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部