摘要
反对阐释、过度阐释和强制阐释均背离了传统阐释学语言与意义和谐对应的阐释模式,语言无法恰当地表达和揭示意义。其出现的根本原因和内在模式具有一致性,即阐释的意义出现了危机。具体来说,反对阐释否定意义;过度阐释无限衍义;而强制阐释则预设意义。这些意义危机的不同姿态在深层结构上也折射了不同的理论范式,即反对阐释是文本中心论,阐释沦为形式的暴力;过度阐释是读者中心论,阐释变成"意味"的暴力;而强制阐释则是理论中心论,阐释最终走向理论的暴力。
Anti-interpretation,over-interpretation and coercive interpretation deviate from the interpretation model of the traditional hermeneutics containing a harmonious correspondence between language and meaning,which is caused by the crises in the meaning of interpretation. Specifically,anti-interpretation negates meaning,over-interpretation derives meaning infinitely,while coercive interpretation presupposes meaning. The different attitudes of these meaning crises also reflect different theoretical paradigms in deep structures: anti-interpretation adopts text-centered theory in which interpretation descends to the violence of form; over-interpretation adopts reader-centered theory in which interpretation becomes the violence of significance; and coercive interpretation adopts theory-centered theory in which interpretation eventually leads to the violence of theory.
出处
《华南师范大学学报(社会科学版)》
CSSCI
北大核心
2018年第1期170-174,192,共5页
Journal of South China Normal University:Social Science Edition
基金
国家社科基金项目"网络文学‘新文类’的形式创新及其审美嬗变研究"(16CZW003)
辽宁省高等学校优秀人才支持计划资助项目(WJQ2015010)
中国博士后科学基金第60批面上资助项目"网络文学‘新文类’的媒介变革及其美学考察"(2016M602120)
关键词
反对阐释
过度阐释
强制阐释
预设意义
理论中心
anti-interpretation
over-interpretation
coercive interpretation
the meaning of presupposition
theory-centered