斯金纳对马基雅维利式共和主义的典范阐释

Quentin Skinner's Exemplary Interpretation of Machiavelli Republicanism

斯金纳对当代共和主义的言说主要倚重于对马基雅维利的判辨。在解读马基雅维利的过程中,斯金纳试图回答马基雅维利与"镜鉴类作者"之间的一致性问题,并讨论了共和主义前景下政治自由的可能性问题。斯金纳阐述了马基雅维利与共和传统之间的连续性,同时指出马基雅维利的独创性在于将德行引入到政治生活中。同时,通过在共和主义的传统中发掘"失落的宝藏",斯金纳介入到关于当代自由概念的争论,打破了自由主义在概念和范式上的垄断。理解斯金纳对马基雅维利式共和主义的典范阐释,有助于我们从文本诠释的路径,认识当代共和主义中"德行"与"法律"这两种范式之间的异同,从而深化对政治现代性问题的思考。

Skinner＇s words about contemporary republicanism mainly depend on the judgment of Machiavelli. In the process of reading Machiavelli,Skinner tried to answer Machiavelli consistency issues with ＂mirror writer＂,and discusses the possibility about political freedom under the prospect of republicanism. Skinner explained the continuity between Machiavelli and republican tradition,and pointed out that Machiavelli＇s originality was introduce virtue into political life. At the same time,through the exploration of ＂lost treasure＂in the tradition of republicanism,Skinner stepped into the argue about the concept of contemporary freedom and broke the monopoly of liberalism in concept and paradigm. Understand Skinner＇s exemplary interpretation of Machiavelli＇s republicanism,help us through the path of the text interpretation,understanding the similarities and differences between the two paradigms of ＂virtue＂and ＂law＂in modern republicanism,thus deepening the political thinking about the problems of modernity.