期刊文献+

企业实施国际化双元战略的创新效应——以竞争强度为调节 被引量:19

Impacting mechanism of international ambidexterity on innovation performance:The moderating effect of internal and external competitive intensity
原文传递
导出
摘要 理论上仅指出了组织双元思想在国际化战略实施中的重要性,而对于国际化双元是否以及在什么条件下影响创新绩效缺乏系统思考。整合组织双元与国际化理论,研究了国际化双元的平衡维度和联合维度对于创新绩效的影响,以及内部竞争强度和外部竞争强度的调节效应。基于227家制造企业的问卷调查,发现国际化双元的平衡和联合对创新绩效具有正向影响,内部竞争强度负向调节国际化双元与创新绩效的关系,而外部竞争强度正向调节这一关系。研究结论实证支持了国际化双元的理论构想,深化了国际化双元理论框架。 Existing research has pointed out the importance of integrating organizational ambidexterity into international business, but doesn' t uncover the question whether firms should and are able to implement exploring and exploiting internationalization simultaneous- ly, and under what conditions is more beneficial. This paper integrates organizational ambidexterity and international business to define the concept of balance and combined dimensions of international ambidexterity, and tests their impact on innovation performance and the moderating effect of internal and external competitive intensity. Based on survey data of 227 Chinese manufacturing firms, we find that balance and combined dimensions of international ambidexterity both positively influence innovation performance, internal competi- tive intensity negatively and external competitive intensity positively moderate their relationships respectively. This paper supports the international ambidexterity theory and contributes to the boundary conditions.
作者 吴航 陈劲
出处 《科学学研究》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2018年第2期334-341,共8页 Studies in Science of Science
基金 国家自然科学基金青年基金项目(71502064)
关键词 国际化双元 探索 利用 内部竞争强度 外部竞争强度 international ambidexterity exploration exploitation internal competitive intensity external competitive intensity
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献162

  • 1吴航,陈劲,郑小勇.新兴经济体中企业国际多样化与创新绩效:所有权结构的调节效应[J].科研管理,2014,35(11):77-83. 被引量:13
  • 2谢洪明,刘常勇,陈春辉.市场导向与组织绩效的关系:组织学习与创新的影响——珠三角地区企业的实证研究[J].管理世界,2006,22(2):80-94. 被引量:207
  • 3Atuahene-Gima K., S. F. Slater and E. M. Olson, 2005, "The Contingent Value of Responsive and Proactive Market Orientations for New Product Program Performance",Journal of Product Innovation Management, Vol.22, pp.464-482.
  • 4Baker W. and J. M. Sinkula, 1999, "The Synergistic Effect of Market Orientation and Learning Orientation on Organizational Performance", Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science,Vol. 27, No.4, pp. 411-427.
  • 5Berthon P., J. Hulbert and L. Pitt, 1999, "To Serve or Create? Strategic Orientations toward Customers and Innovation",California Management Review,Vol. 42, No.l,pp.37-58.
  • 6Burgelman, R. A., 1994, "Fading Memories: A Process Theory of Strategic Business Exit in Dynamic Environments',Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol.39, pp.24-56.
  • 7Zahra, S. A. and G. George, 2002, "Absorptive Capacity: A Review, Reconeeptualization and Extension",Academy of Management Review, Vol.27, pp.185-203.
  • 8Burgelman, R. A., 2002, "Strategy as Vector and the Inertia of Coevolutionary Lock-in", Administrative Science Quarterly,Vol.47, pp.325-357.
  • 9Cao Q., E. Gedajlovic and H. P. Zhang, 2009, "Unpacking Organizational Ambidexterity: Dimensions, Contingencies, and Synergistic Effects", Organization Science, Vol.20, No.4, pp. 781-796.
  • 10Cegarra-Navarro J. G. and F. Dewhurst, 2007, "Linking Organizational Learning and Customer Capital Through an Ambidexterity Context: An Empirical Investigation in SMEs", The International Journal of Human Resource Management,Vol.18, No.10, pp.1720-1747.

共引文献285

同被引文献190

引证文献19

二级引证文献68

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部