期刊文献+

预测评分和护理干预对阴道分娩产后出血发生率及产妇健康的影响分析 被引量:6

The Impact Analysis of the Predictive Scoring and Nursing Intervention to Incidence of Postpartum Hemorrhage and Maternal Health
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:对阴道分娩产后出血发生率及产妇健康采取预测评分及护理干预的效果进行研究及判定。方法:选取护理过的60例产妇作为本次研究对象,产妇收治时间在2016年2月-2017年1月,将其依据护理方案分为对照组及观察组,各30例,对照组行常规护理,观察组行预测评分及护理干预,并对比两组产妇产后出血发生率、产后出血量及生活质量情况。结果:观察组产妇护理后生活质量各项评分均高于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(t=6.77、6.80、6.53、10.42,P<0.05)。观察组产妇产后出血发生率为3.33%,低于对照组的20.00%,差异有统计学意义(X^2=4.04,P=0.04)。观察组产后出血量为(710.65±252.63)ml,低于对照组的(1 025.46±255.97)ml,差异有统计学意义(t=4.79,P=0.01)。结论:对阴道分娩产后出血发生率及产妇健康采取预测评分及护理干预的效果显著,值得在临床中推广实施。 Objective: To study and determine the predictive scoring and nursing intervention to incidence of postpartum hemorrhage and maternal health. Method: In this study, 60 parturients were selected, puerpera admitted time were from February 2016 to January 2016, the parturients were divided into control group and observation group, with 30 cases in each group, the control group was given routine nursing care, and the observation group was given prediction score and nursing intervention.The incidence of postpartum hemorrhage, postpartum bleeding and quality of life were compared between the two groups.Result: The scores of life quality in the observation group were higher than those in the control group, the differences were statistically significant(t=6.77, 6.80, 6.53, 10.42, P〈0.05).The incidence of postpartum bleeding in the observation group was 3.33%, lower than 20.00% of the control group, the difference was statistically significant(x2=4.04, P=0.04).The amount of postpartum hemorrhage in the observation group was (710.65 ± 252.63) ml, lower than (1 025.46 ± 255.97)ml of the control group, the difference was statistically significant(t=4.79, P=0.01).Conclnsion: The effect of the predictive scoring and nursing intervention to incidence of postpartum hemorrhage and maternal health is obvious, and it is worth promoting the implementation in clinic.
作者 蒋霞
出处 《中外医学研究》 2018年第4期70-71,共2页 CHINESE AND FOREIGN MEDICAL RESEARCH
关键词 阴道分娩 产后出血 产妇健康 预测评分 护理干预 Vaginal delivery Postpartum hemorrhage Maternal health Prediction score Nursing intervention
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

二级参考文献73

  • 1王玉华.应用“产后出血预测评分表”预测评分 减少产后出血[J].中国妇幼保健,2005,20(7):859-860. 被引量:25
  • 2曹泽毅.中华妇产科学[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2006:2056-2065.
  • 3全国产后出血防治协作组.中国妇女产时及产后24小时内失血量调查.中华妇产科杂志,2007,.
  • 4张方林主编.产科检查[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2001:40,
  • 5Poujade 0,Zappa M,Letendre I,et al. Predictive factors for failure ofpelvic arterial embolization for postpartum hemorrhage [ J ]. Int JGynaecol Obstet,2012,117(2) :119-123.
  • 6安牧尔.妇科主治医师400问[M].北京:北京医科大学、中国协和医科大学联合出版社,2007:210-220.
  • 7王志容,饶建云,肖小玲,王小平,钟燕莉.卡孕栓不同时间给药预防产后出血的临床观察[J].中国药房,2007,18(35):2768-2769. 被引量:16
  • 8Huchon C,Dumont A,Traoré M. A prediction score for maternal mortality in Senegal and Mali[J].{H}OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY,2013,(5):1049-1056.
  • 9Liu G,Yuan B,Wang Y. Exaggerated placental site leading to postpartum hemorrhage:a case report[J].{H}Journal of Reproductive Medicine,2013,(10):448-450.
  • 10Heesen M,Hofmann T,Kl6hr S. Is general anaesthesia for caesarean section associated with postpartum haemorrhage?Systematic review and meta-analysis[J].{H}ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA,2013,(9):1092-1102.

同被引文献44

引证文献6

二级引证文献14

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部