期刊文献+

我国上市公司舞弊揭发制度建设:基于内容分析的经验证据 被引量:3

下载PDF
导出
摘要 公司舞弊揭发制度又称吹哨制度,是抑制公司舞弊、提高公司治理质量的重要制度安排。本文回顾了国外上市公司舞弊揭发立法规制发展情况,指出了我国上市公司舞弊揭发制度建设亟需改进的领域。通过内容分析法对我国128家上市公司反舞弊制度文本从组织设计、舞弊行为界定、舞弊揭发方式、流程等角度展开经验评价,发现我国上市公司舞弊揭发制度存在对损害公共利益的违法行为关注较少、舞弊揭发组织制度设计不健全、对舞弊外部揭发渠道不明确等问题。最后,从公司治理与外部立法视角对我国上市公司舞弊揭发的制度完善及立法建设提出了具体建议。 Corporate fraud disclosure system is also known as whistle-blowing system, which is an important institutional arrangement of suppressing corporate fraud and improving corporate governance quality. The research introduces regulatory system of whistle-blowing in foreign countries, and analyzes the areas which need improvement for China's whistle-blowing regulations. The research then performs a textual content analysis for whistle-blowing rule of 128 Chinese listed companies, which covers organizational design, whistle-blowing behavior identification, and whistle-blowing approach and process. The research shows that there are some problems in the fraud disclosure system of listed companies in our country, such as less attention to the illegal behaviors that harm the public interest, imperfect design of the fraud disclosure organization system and unclear external disclosure channels for fraud. The research also provides advice for how to improve whistle-blowing regulation in China's security market from the perspectives of corporate governance and legislation.
作者 李宗彦
出处 《企业经济》 CSSCI 北大核心 2018年第2期95-101,共7页 Enterprise Economy
基金 国家社科基金重点项目"基于内部控制视角的腐败防控机制与实现路径研究"(项目编号:15AJY002) 教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目"国际会计准则制定话语权形成机制与中国参与策略研究"(项目编号:16YJC790053) 浙江省哲学社会科学基金项目"公司治理视域下民营企业舞弊揭发行为与制度研究:以浙江省为例"(项目编号:16NDJC152YB)
关键词 舞弊揭发制度 内容分析法 上市公司监管 内部控制 corporate fraud disclosure system content analysis regulation of public companies internal control
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献129

  • 1李淑如.“公司治理原则之内部组织控制与不法资讯揭露之法制发展”,载《公益揭发--职场伦理新趋势》,巨流图书股份有限公司2010年版,第59页.
  • 2骆海涛.“长虹范德均十年战未休”,载《南方周末》2010年6月3日.
  • 3Association of Certified Fraud Examiners, Report to the Nations on Occupational Fraud and Abuse (2010 Global Fraud Study), 2011.
  • 4Alexander Dyck, Adair Morse and Luigi Zingales. Who Blows the Whistle on Corporate Fraud[J]. The Journal of Finance, 2010, 65(6): 2213- 2253.
  • 5Elletta Sangrey Callahan and Terry Moreheacl Dworkin. The State of State Whistleblower Protection[J]. American Busine's Law Journal, 2000, 38(1): 99-118.
  • 6Mary Kreiner 1Kamirez. Blowing the Whistle on Whistleblower Protection: A Tale of Refoml versus Power[J]. University of CincinnatiLaw Review, 2007, 76: 183-233.
  • 7Megan E. Mowrey, L. Stephen Cash, and Thomas L. Dickens. Does Sarbanes-Oxley Protect Whistleblowers? The Recent Experience of Companies and Whisdeblowing Workers Under SOX[J]. William.& Mary Business Law Review,, 2010, 1(2): 431 .
  • 8U.S, Securities and Exchange Commission, Assessment of the SEC' s BountyProgram (Report No. 474), March 29, 2010.
  • 9U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, Investigation of Failure of the SEC to Uncover Bernard Madoff' s Ponzi Scheme (Public Version), Report No. OIG-509, August 31, 2009.
  • 10Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Commner Protection Act; Final Rules for Implementing the Whistleblower Provisions of Section 23 of the Conmmdity Exchange Act 07 CFR Part 165).

共引文献50

同被引文献24

引证文献3

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部