期刊文献+

PRECIS-2:基于研究目标的试验设计 被引量:6

The PRECIS-2 tool: designing trials that are fit for purpose
原文传递
导出
摘要 采用随机对照试验(RCT)评价的干预措施效果,涉及理论疗效和实际的临床效果两方面。PRECIS(Pragmatic—Explanatory Continuum Indicator Summary)通过评价RCT设计的解释性和实用性两方面的程度,指导研究者如何实行干预和试验设计,使RCT在内部真实性和外部真实性之间达到一个平衡。在临床试验方案设计过程中,PRECIS的作用逐渐被研究者所认同。为了确保试验的设计与结果相关联,便于患者、临床医生和政策决策者应用,国际多团队专家对PRECIS进行了修正和升级,提出了新的PRECIS-2。PRECIS-2的9个维度都是为了帮助试验设计者思考研究设计的预期效果与试验结果的一致性和特定场景的适用性。本文旨在介绍PRECIS-2的研发、基本原理、特点及应用,以期为国内临床试验设计、决策提供帮助。 To evaluate the intervention effects of randomized controlled trials (RCT) involved in theoretical efficacy and actual clinical outcome (effectiveness). Pragmatic-Explanatory Continuum Indicator Summary (PRECIS) is a tool to help researchers make decisions in study design which is consistent with the intended purpose of their trial which can be used in the design of RCT to balance the internal validity and external validity. The role of PRECIS has been gradually recognized in the practice of designing clinical trials. To ensure that the design choices are concordant with the intention and the facilitation of use set by patients, clinicians and policy makers, a new PRECIS-2 tool has been developed by mangy international team experts under modification and upgrading the existing PRECIS. The PRECIS-2 tool mainly focuses on trial design choices which determining the applicability of a trial. PRECIS-2 has nine domains, with each of them intends to help the researchers consider the consequences of that design decision in terms of the applicability of the results under particular setting. The purpose of this paper is to introduce the development, basic principle, characteristics and application of PRECIS-2 for the designers and decision makers when working on clinical trials.
作者 胡贵平 詹思延 Hu Gulping;Zhan Siyan(Department of Occupational and Environmental Health, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing 100191, China)
出处 《中华流行病学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2018年第2期222-226,共5页 Chinese Journal of Epidemiology
基金 国家自然科学基金(81473067)
关键词 随机对照试验 PRECIS-2 解释性试验 实用性试验 Randomized controlled trial Pragmatic-Explanatory Continuum Indicator Summary-2 Explanatory trial Pragmatic/practical trial
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献31

  • 1张彦红,梁伟雄,朱磊,刘云涛,张万方,温泽淮.实用性临床试验与解释性临床试验的比较[J].中国中西医结合杂志,2009,29(2):161-164. 被引量:15
  • 2唐金陵,江宇,张宏伟.随机对照试验//李立明.流行病学.6版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2007:129-163.
  • 3van der Windt DA,Koes BW,van Aarst M,et al.Practi-cal aspects of conducting a pragmatic randomised trial inprimary care:patient recruitment and outcome assess-ment[].British Journal of General Practice.2000
  • 4Schwartz,D,Lellouch,J.Explanatory and pragmatic attitudes in therapeutic trials[].Journal of Chronic Diseases.1967
  • 5MACRAE KD.Pragmatic versus explanatory trials[].Int J Technol Assess Health Care.1989
  • 6Godwin M,Ruhland L,Casson I,et al.Pragmatic controlled clinical trials in primary care: the struggle between external and internal validity[].BMC Medical Research Methodology.2003
  • 7Tunis,SR,Stryer,DB,Clancy,CM.Practical clinical trials: increasing the value of clinical research for decision making in clinical and health policy[].The Journal of The American Medical Association.2003
  • 8Helms,PJ.‘Real world’ pragmatic clinical trials: what are they and what do they tell us?[].Pediatric Allergy and Immunology.2002
  • 9Macpherson H.Pragmatic clinical trials[].Complement Ther Med.2004
  • 10Witt CM,Jena S,Selim D,et al.Pragmatic randomized trial evaluatingthe clinical and economic effectiveness of acupuncture for chronic lowback pain[].American Journal of Epidemiology.2006

共引文献17

同被引文献33

引证文献6

二级引证文献15

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部