期刊文献+

492例胰十二指肠切除术后胃排空延迟的预后因素分析 被引量:14

Analysis of risk factors and outcomes for delayed gastric emptying following pancreaticoduodenectomy:a single center experience of 492 cases
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨胰十二指肠切除(PD)术后发生胃排空延迟(CR-DGE)的预后因素。方法回顾性分析2012年1月至2014年12月在南京医科大学第一附属医院胰腺中心接受PD手术的492例患者资料。男性315例(64.0%),女性177例(36.0%),平均年龄60.5岁。采用单因素分析及多因素回归模型分析预后因素,筛选出与CR-DGE有关的独立预后因素。结果DGE的总体发生率为29.5%,其中与临床相关的B、C级DGE发生率分别为4.3%和5.9%。多因素回归模型分析结果显示,胰管直径〈3 mm(OR=1.888,P=0.042)、保留幽门胰十二指肠切除术(OR=2.627,P=0.005)和术后临床相关胰瘘(OR=2.740,P=0.007)是CR-DGE发生的独立预后因素。术后胰瘘严重程度、腹腔积液和腹腔感染与DGE的严重程度相关(χ2=21.360、14.422、14.378,P=0.011、0.002、0.002)。发生临床相关DGE患者的术后住院时间[31(24~41)d]和住院费用[(122 367.5±66 068.3)元]较无DGE患者[13(11~17)d、(78 200.7±27 043.9)元]明显增加,差异均有统计学意义(P值均〈0.01)。结论术中发现胰管直径细、施行保留幽门胰十二指肠切除术、术后出现胰瘘时,应警惕CR-DGE的发生,早期予以临床干预。 ObjectiveTo evaluate risk factors for delayed gastric emptying(DGE)following pancreaticoduodenectomy(PD).MethodsThere were 492 consecutive patients who underwent PD in Pancreas Center, the First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical University between January 2012 and December 2014 were identified from a prospective database.There were 315 male and 177 female patients with a median age of 60.5 years.Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to investigate the independent risk factors for clinically relevant DGE(CR-DGE).ResultsThe overall incidence of DGE was 29.5%, with Grade B and C occurring at 4.3% and 5.9%, respectively.In multivariate analysis, pancreatic duct diameter less than 3 mm(OR=1.888, P=0.042), pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy(OR=2.627, P=0.005) and clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula(OR=2.740, P=0.007) were independently associated with CR-DGE.Other main complications such as postoperative pancreatic fistula, pyoperitoneum, intraabdominal infection were also associated with the severity of DGE(χ2=21.360, 14.422, 14.378; P=0.011, 0.002, 0.002). DGE patients had a significantly prolonged postoperative length of stay(31(24-41)d vs. 13(11-17)d) and increased medical cost((122 367.5±66 068.3)yuan vs. (78 200.7±27 043.9)yuan)(both P〈0.01).ConclusionsSmall pancreatic duct, underwent pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy and suffered postoperative pancreatic fistula might indicate a high risk of CR-DGE.
出处 《中华外科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2018年第1期35-40,共6页 Chinese Journal of Surgery
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(81272382) 江苏省“六大人才高峰”资助项目(2014-WSW-006) 江苏省科技厅临床前沿技术项目(BE2016788)
关键词 胰十二指肠切除术 术后并发症 胃排空延迟 术后胰瘘 危险因素 Pancreaticoduodenectomy Complication Delayed gastric emptying Pancreatic fistula Risk factor
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献46

  • 1Whipple AO, Parsons WB, Mullins CR. Treatment of Carcinomaof the Ampulla of Vater. Ann Surg 1935; 102: 763-779 [PMID:17856666].
  • 2Whipple AO. The rationale of radical surgery for cancer of thepancreas and ampullary region. Ann Surg 1941; 114: 612-615 [PMID:17857897].
  • 3Watson K. Carcinoma of ampulla of vater successful radicalresection. Br J Surg 1944; 31: 368-373.
  • 4Traverso LW, Longmire WP. Preservation of the pylorus inpancreaticoduodenectomy. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1978; 146: 959-962[PMID: 653575].
  • 5Lin PW, Shan YS, Lin YJ, Hung CJ. Pancreaticoduodenectomyfor pancreatic head cancer: PPPD versus Whipple procedure.Hepatogastroenterology 2005; 52: 1601-1604 [PMID: 16201125].
  • 6Srinarmwong C, Luechakiettisak P, Prasitvilai W. Standard whipple's operation versus pylorus preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy:a randomized controlled trial study. J Med Assoc Thai 2008; 91:693-698 [PMID: 18672634].
  • 7Seiler CA, Wagner M, Bachmann T, Redaelli CA, Schmied B, UhlW, Friess H, Büchler MW. Randomized clinical trial of pyloruspreservingduodenopancreatectomy versus classical Whippleresection-long term results. Br J Surg 2005; 92: 547-556 [PMID:15800958 DOI: 10.1002/bjs.4881].
  • 8Tran KT, Smeenk HG, van Eijck CH, Kazemier G, Hop WC, Greve JW, Terpstra OT, Zijlstra JA, Klinkert P, Jeekel H. Pylorus preservingpancreaticoduodenectomy versus standard Whipple procedure: aprospective, randomized, multicenter analysis of 170 patients withpancreatic and periampullary tumors. Ann Surg 2004; 240: 738-745[PMID: 15492552].
  • 9Iqbal N, Lovegrove RE, Tilney HS, Abraham AT, Bhattacharya S,Tekkis PP, Kocher HM. A comparison of pancreaticoduodenectomywith pylorus preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy: a meta-analysisof 2822 patients. Eur J Surg Oncol 2008; 34: 1237-1245 [PMID:18242943 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2007.12.004].
  • 10Jimenez RE, Fernandez-del Castillo C, Rattner DW, Chang Y,Warshaw AL. Outcome of pancreaticoduodenectomy with pyloruspreservation or with antrectomy in the treatment of chronicpancreatitis. Ann Surg 2000; 231: 293-300 [PMID: 10714621].

共引文献7

同被引文献83

引证文献14

二级引证文献20

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部