萧统集编撰及版本考论

Comment on the Compilation and Edition of the Collections Written by Xiao Tong

《梁昭明太子文集》乃宋人据它书辑出萧统诗文的重编本,重编在南宋初年,且并未参据《玉台新咏》。刘世珩影刻之宋淳熙本仅载刘孝绰集序,但据所载萧统诗文作于普通三年前后者均有,断定不属于刘孝绰编本系统,也再次佐证出于宋人重编。现存刘世珩影刻及盛宣怀重刻之两部宋淳熙本,存在文字、卷首序篇目等差异,前者属淳熙早期印本,后者则属后印本。明本萧统集均源出周满本,宝训堂本乃据周满本重刻,而《萧梁文苑》本、张燮本又增益其它篇目。其中《萧梁文苑》本存在篇目误收的情况,相较而言不及张燮本严谨。清康熙刻释行景注本《六律六吕文启》颇具文献价值。

The collection named Liang Zhaoming Taizi wen ji written by Xiao Tong was recompiled based on the poetic prose from other classics,for example,literature collection and Genus-books in the beginning of Southern Song Dynasty,without reference to Yutai xin yong. The reprinted edition from the edition printed in Chunxi of Song dynasty by Liu Shiheng only has the preface written by Liu Xiaochuo,according to the poetic prose written before and after three years of Putong. It is concluded that it isn't the edition system compiled by Liu Xiaochuo,and also proves that the collection was recompiled in Song dynasty. There exist differences in the text and preface numbers between the two reprinted editions by Liu Shiheng and Sheng Xuanhuai. The former is the original printed copy while the latter is the post-printed one. The collection in Ming dynasty derives from the edition printed by Zhou Man,which is the original text of the edition printed by Bao Xuntang,and the edition named Xiaoliang wen yuan and the edition printed by Zhang Xie both collect other articles written by Xiao Tong. The former has the articles not from Xiao Tong,so it isn't precise compared to the latter. The book named Liulv liulv wen qi,annotated by Shi Xingjing and printed in Kangxi's reign of Qing dynasty,has the literature value.