摘要
关于阳明学发展历程的描述,以钱德洪的"学三变"和"教三变"最为著名。而这所谓"三变"之说既可以被理解为"三个阶段"("两次变化"),又可以解释成"三次变化"("四个阶段")。这两种理解皆有出处。然而无论是"三次变化",还是"两次变化",学者们在具体内容的评论上都制造出了或大或小的差异。对这些差异的制造者而言,制造这些差异并非是无意义的,而是深含着他们借题发挥的"意图"。
Among all descriptions about the developments of Yangmingism,the most famous statements are Qian Dehong's of "three changes of learning"and "three changes of teaching". The idea of "three changes"can be both defined as"three phases( two shifts) "and"three changes( four phases) ",which can be both supported by relative literature.However,as for these two interpretations,different researchers vary their comments,big and small. These different comments are not meaningless because they contain some intention to come up with more ideas.
出处
《贵阳学院学报(社会科学版)》
2017年第6期5-11,共7页
Journal of Guiyang University:Social Sciences
关键词
阳明学历程
差异化的评论
差异化的原因
developments of Yangmingism
differentiation of comments
reasons of differentiation