摘要
郝大维和安乐哲的研究使得今天的美国实用主义能够揭示汉学领域,尤其是儒学诠释方面的一种重要趋势。他们提供了一种针对儒学社群实用主义的解读方式,可视为欧洲启蒙运动反话语的一部分。研究指出:安乐哲和郝大维所呈现的这种研究方式并未公平地对待实用主义得益于启蒙运动及其成果这一事实,进而提出一种不同的进路。与其说这一进路是在为儒学的当代复兴作辩护,不如说它是在辩护当下儒学现代重建事业的实用主义原则关联性。
The researches made by David L. Hall and Roger T. Ames can bring the today's pragmatism into revealing the Chinese studies,especially when it becomes an important trend of Confucian interpretation. They provided a kind of community pragmatism interpretation for Confucian,which can be regarded as a part of anti-discourse in European enlightenment movement. However,this paper thinks that their explanation have not truly revealed the fact that pragmatism is benefited from the enlightenment movement. Therefore,this paper holds that it is not so much relating to the relevance of pragmatism in the process of reconstructing Confucian as Confucian is being rejuvenated.
出处
《贵阳学院学报(社会科学版)》
2017年第6期101-108,共8页
Journal of Guiyang University:Social Sciences
关键词
实用主义
儒学
传统
民主
自主
共同体
超越性
pragmatism
Confucian
tradition
democracy
self
community
transcendence