如皋市新生儿复苏培训远期效果评价

Evaluation of the Long-term Effect of Neonatal Resuscitation Training in Rugao City

目的评价新生儿复苏培训的远期效果。方法 2016年全市新生儿复苏培训后18个月内,实施全市统筹管理,落实综合干预措施,促进复苏培训长效管理。2017年底,组织了新生儿复苏现场考核与问卷调查,通过问卷调查结果分别与培训前后测试结果进行独立样本均值的t检验,评估复苏培训的远期效果。结果新生儿复苏培训前后摸底与即时测试各为291名、远期效果问卷调查251名医务人员。卫生所妇幼医生远期测试(95.57±3.50)分,与培训前摸底测试(90.21±5.00)分比较,差异有统计学意义(F=0.955,P=0.334;t=4.112,P=0.000);与培训结束即时测试(95.21±4.77)分比较,差异无统计学意义(F=1.115,P=0.297;t=0.287,P=0.775);医院护理人员远期测试(94.94±3.70)分,与培训前摸底测试(89.11±9.48)分比较,差异有统计学意义(F=34.920,P=0.000;t=4.850,P=0.000),与培训结束即时测试(95.18±3.68)分比较,差异无统计学意义(F=0.073,P=0.778;t=0.381,P=0.704);医院医生远期测试(94.72±4.31)分,与培训前摸底测试(88.53±9.79)分比较,差异有统计学意义(F=69.067,P=0.000;t=7.953,P=0.000),与培训结束即时测试(95.36±4.90)分比较,差异无统计学意义(F=0.505,P=0.478;t=1.302,P=0.194)。结论新生儿复苏培训远期效果高于培训前摸底测试结果,与培训结束即时效果处于同等水平,促进复苏培训长效管理的综合干预措施发挥了积极的作用。

Objective To evaluate the long-term effect of neonatal resuscitation training. Methods A small class training of neonatal resuscitation was held in 2016, in the next 18 months, integrated management was implemented, comprehensive interventions have been implemented, long term management of recovery training was promoted. At the end of 2017, the field assessment and questionnaire survey of neonatal resuscitation were organized, The results of the questionnaire were compared with the test results before and after the training through the t test of the independent sample mean. assessing the long-term efect of resuscitation training. Results There were 291 medical staf participated in the small class training of neonatal resuscitation and 251 medical staf participated in the long-term effect questionnaire survey. The difference was statistically significant between forward test （95.57±3.50） points and pre-training test （90.21±5.00） points in maternal and child doctors （F=0.955, P=0.334; t=4.112, P=0.000）, the diference was not statistically signifcant between forward test and post training test （95.21±4.77） points （F=1.115, P=0.297; t=0.287, P=0.775）. The difference was statistically significant between forward test （94.94±3.70） points and pre-training test （89.11±9.48） points in hospital nursing staff （F=34.920, P=0.000, t=4.850, P=0.000）, the diference was not statistically signifcant between forward test and post training test （95.18±3.68） points （F=0.073, P=0.778; t=0.381, P=0.704）. The difference was statistically significant between forward test （94.72±4.31） points and pre-training test （88.53±9.79） points in hospital doctor （F=69.067, P=0.000; t=7.953, P=0.000）, the diference was not statistically signifcant between forward test and post training test （95.36±4.90） points （F=0.505, P=0.478, t=1.302, P=0.194）. Conclusion The long-term efect of neonatal resuscitation training was better than that before training, it was at the same level as the immediate efect of training, the comprehensive intervention of the long-term management of recovery training played a positive role.