摘要
本文一方面依据柏林大学档案馆中保存的陈康先生的学籍档案材料来重构其留德经历,以此纠正传统观点中的一些偏颇之处和补充若干细节;另一方面,以陈康先生博士论文中有关《斐多》中分离问题的解释为例,揭示他的两位导师哈特曼和施滕策尔对其治学思路的影响。通过将陈康先生的研究置于哈特曼、施滕策尔和纳托普关于柏拉图理念学说解释策略的论争背景当中,本文将从一个侧面展示出20世纪初德语学界柏拉图解释的复杂面相。
This paper consists of two parts. Based on records and materials preserved in the University Archives of the Humboldt University of Berlin,I will first of all reconstruct Chen Chung-hwan's study experience in Germany,so as to clear up some misunderstandings in the traditional view and add a few more details to it. The second part concerns with the influence of the two supervisors Nicolai Hartmann and Julius Stenzel on Chen's dissertation. I will take Chen's interpretation of the Chorismos problem in Plato's Phaedo as an example. By locating Chen's research in the debate between Hartmann,Stenzel and Natorp about how to interpret Plato's theory of Ideas,I try to demonstrate the complexity of Plato interpretation among German scholars during the first half of the last century.
出处
《云南大学学报(社会科学版)》
北大核心
2018年第2期13-23,共11页
The Journal of Yunnan University:Social Sciences Edition