摘要
实验方法作为统计学因果推断的重要方法,在公共管理与公共政策研究中得到了越来越多的应用。实地实验作为实验方法的新发展,相比传统的实验室实验和调查实验具有更高的外在效度和现实应用价值,被广泛用于变量之间的因果推断及政策与项目的影响评估中。论文在解释实验方法的统计学因果推断基础、并比较各类实验优劣势之后,举例分析了实地实验的基本原理、程序和可能出现的各种现实问题,并以公共政策影响评估为切入点讨论了中国公共管理与政策研究中使用实地实验方法面临的挑战与机遇。
As an important method of statistical causal inference,experimental methods have been used more and more in the study of public administration and public policy.Field experiments,as a new development of experimental methods,have higher external validity and broader practical implications than traditional laboratory experiments.They are widely used in policy and program impact evaluations.After explaining the statistical principle of experimental methods and comparing various sorts of experiments,this paper analyzes the potential problems of field experiments.Using public policy impact evaluation as an example,the paper discusses the challenges and opportunities of field experiment methods in China.
出处
《公共行政评论》
CSSCI
北大核心
2018年第1期87-107,221,共21页
Journal of Public Administration
基金
教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目"基于IAT实验方法的政府信任测量与影响机制研究"(17XJC630009)
四川省软科学项目"风险技术公众态度形成机制研究"(2016ZR0019)
关键词
因果推断
实地实验
准实验
自然实验
影响评估
Causal Inference
Field Experiments
Quasi-Experiments
Natural Experiments
Impact Evaluation