期刊文献+

一种非参数的多策略方法:多策略的海明距离判别法 被引量:2

The Formulation of Multiple-Strategies Hamming Distance Discrimination
下载PDF
导出
摘要 将单策略汉明距离判别法(SS-HDD)拓展至多策略情境(MS-HDD),并通过多因素的模拟设计及与已有研究的比较,考察其精确性与适宜性.研究结果表明:1)MS-HDD构建思路简洁,无需前提假设和参数估计,计算简便;2)单策略情境:MS-HDD与SS-HDD具有等同的判别效果,且判准率均高于相同条件下的广义距离模型(GDD)和多策略广义距离模型(MSCD);3)多策略情境:MS-HDD具有与MSCD相当的PMR和SMR,MS-HDD可适于多策略测验情境. The purpose of the paper is to formulate a nonparametric multiple-strategies cognitive diagnosis discrimi-nation method, which called Multiple-Strategies Hamming Distance Discrimination ( MS-HDD) , to estimate exami- nees7 knowledge states that generated in multiple-strategies of problem solving. The results show that under the sin-gle-strategy testing situation,all of the SMR,AAMR and the PMR of MS-HDD method are as similar as SS-HDD^s results. Under the multiple-strategies testing situation, the MS-HDD leads to more accuracy in these indexes than the SS-HDD. Under the multiple-strategies testing situation,MS-HDD is compared with MSCD,and the result show that MS-HDD has more better performance than MSCD when the random slip is growing. All in all, the method that ex-tends the SS-HDD method to all for multiple-strategies of problem solving,which is called MS-HDD,was suited to multiple-strategies testing situation and could be accepted in our practical application.
出处 《江西师范大学学报(自然科学版)》 CAS 北大核心 2018年第1期67-73,共7页 Journal of Jiangxi Normal University(Natural Science Edition)
基金 教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金(16YJA190002)资助项目
关键词 认知诊断 多策略 海明距离判别法 判准率 cognitive diagnosis multiple-strategies Hamming Distance Discrimination PMR
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献185

  • 1林海菁,丁树良.具有认知诊断功能的计算机化自适应测验的研究与实现[J].心理学报,2007,39(4):747-753. 被引量:20
  • 2Leighton J P, Gierl M J, Hunka S M. The attribute hierarchy method for cognitive assessment: a variation on Tatsuoka' s rule-space approach [J]. Journal of Educational Measurement, 2004,41 (3) :205-237.
  • 3Ding Shu-liang, Luo Fen, Cai Yan, et al. Complement to Tatsuoka' s Q matrix theory [ C]. Shigemasu K, Okada A, Imaizumi T, et al. New Trends in Psychometrics,Tokyo:Universal Academy Press,2008:417-424.
  • 4Samejima F. A cognitive diagnosis method using latent trait models: competency space approach and its relationship with DiBello and Stout's unified cognitive-psychometric diagnosis model [ C]. Nichols P D, Chipman S F, Brcnnan R L. Cognitively Diagnostic Assessment, NJ: Erlbatun, 1995 : 391-410.
  • 5Tatsuoka K K. Cognitive assessment an introduction to the rule space method [ M]. New York: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group, 2009.
  • 6Henson R, Douglas J. Test construction for cognitive diagnosis [ J]. Applied Psychological Measurement, 2005,29:262-277.
  • 7Zeng Ling-yan, Ding Shu-hang, Gan Deng-wen. Test construction for cognitive diagnosis [ C]. Shenzhen: Asia-Pacific Conference on Wearable Computing Systems, 2010.
  • 8Kuang Zheng, Ding Shu-liang, Xu'Zhi-yong. Application of support vector machine to cognitive diagnosis [ C]. Shenzhen: Asia-Pacific Conference on Wearable Computing Systems,2010.
  • 9Baker, F. B., & Kim, S.-H. (2004). Item response theory: Parameter estimation techniques (2nd ed.). New York: Marcell Dekker.
  • 10de la Torte, J. (2008). DINA model-and parameter estimation: A didactic. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 34(1), 115-130.

共引文献163

同被引文献32

引证文献2

二级引证文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部