摘要
目的系统评价他汀类药物对社区获得性肺炎(CAP)预后及CAP患病风险的影响。方法计算机检索Pub Med、EMbase、万方医学网及中国知网,检索时间限定为自建库至2016年10月。纳入符合标准的文献21篇,根据Cochrane系统评价手册5.0或Newcastle-Ottawa Scale(NOS)质量评价标准评价纳入研究质量。由两名研究员独立进行文献筛选、资料提取和质量评估,采用Rev Man5.3软件进行Meta分析。结果纳入12篇文献共1 007 765例CAP患者,其中CAP发病前后使用他汀类药物118 096例,未使用他汀类药物889 669例;Meta分析结果显示,他汀类药物的使用能显著降低CAP患者的病死率(OR=0.67,95%CI:0.57~0.79);将上述文献按患者人群分为美洲和欧洲进行亚组分析,前者文献间异质性较小,后者文献间异质性较大,两个亚组分析结果均显示使用他汀类药物能显著降低CAP患者的病死率(OR=0.66,95%CI:0.62~0.67;OR=0.71,95%CI:0.55~0.92)。关于是否降低CAP患者的机械通气率共纳入3篇文献共123 645例CAP患者,其中CAP发病前后使用他汀类药物23 796例,不使用他汀类药物99 849例;Meta分析结果显示,发病前后使用他汀类药物能显著降低CAP患者的机械通气率(OR=0.74,95%CI:0.70~0.78)。关于是否会降低CAP患者的ICU入住率共纳入4篇文献共127 060例CAP患者,其中CAP发病前后使用他汀类药物24 121例,不使用他汀类药物102 939例;Meta分析结果显示,发病前后使用他汀类药物能显著降低CAP患者的ICU入住率(OR=0.85,95%CI:0.82~0.88)。关于是否会降低CAP患者的患病风险共纳入11篇文献共2 124 849例CAP患者,其中CAP发病前长期使用他汀类药物306 108例,不使用他汀类药物1 818 741例;Meta分析结果显示,使用他汀类药物不能显著降低CAP的患病风险(OR=0.85,95%CI:0.85~1.07);将上述文献按病例对照研究和队列研究进行亚组分析,前者显示他汀类可显著增加CAP患病风险(OR=1.12,95%CI:1.03~1.21),后者显示他汀类可显著降低CAP患病风险(OR=0.46,95%CI:0.44~0.49)。结论发病前后使用他汀类药物能显著降低CAP患者的病死率、机械通气率及ICU入住率。长期使用他汀类药物是否可降低CAP的患病风险尚不明确。
Objective To systemically evaluate the the role of statins in prevention and treatment of community-acquired pneumonia(CAP).Methods A computer-based searching was conducted in Pub Med,EMbase,Cochrane Library,Wanfang,and CNKI database up to October 2016.Totally 21 eligible articles were retrieved.According to the Cochrane Handbook 5.0 or Newcastle-Ottawa Scale(NOS) quality evaluation criteria,two independent reviewers carried out literature screening,data retraction,and quality evaluation.Meta-a-nalysis was conducted with Rev Man 5.3 software.Results A total 1 007 765 CAP patients from 12 studies were divided into two groups:statin group(n=118 096) and non-statin group(n=889 669).Meta-analysis suggested that statin use was associated with decreased mortality of CAP(OR=0.67,95% CI:0.57-0.79).We further divided the studies into North America group and Europe group and found the heterogenicity of North America group was lower than that of Europe group,and the Meta-analysis of both group supported the association of statin use with decreased CAP mortality(OR=0.66,95% CI:0.62-0.67;OR=0.71,95% CI:0.55-0.92).To identify the effect of statin use on mechanical ventilation,we included three articles(n=123 645)for further analysis(statin group,n=23 796;non-statin group,n=99 849),and Meta-analysis suggested that statin use was associated with decreased requirement for mechanical ventilation(OR=0.74,95% CI:0.70-0.78).Four articles(n=127 060) were enrolled(statin group,n=24 121 and non-statin group,n=102 939) to analyze the effect of statin use on ICU admission,and Meta-analysis suggested that statin use was associated with decreased requirement for ICU admission(OR=0.85,95% CI:0.82-0.88).Eleven articles(n=2 124 849)(statin group,n=306 108;non-statin group,n=1 818 741) to evaluate the effect of statin use on risk of CAP,and Meta-analysis suggested that long-term use of statins decreased the risk of CAP,although there was no statistical difference(OR=0.85,95% CI:0.85-1.07);the above studies were divided into case-control studies and cohort studies,and the case-control studies revealed statins increased the risk of CAP(OR=1.12,95% CI:1.03-1.21),while the cohort studies supported the association of statin use with decreased CAP risk(OR=0.46,95% CI:0.44-0.49).Conclusions Statin use may decrease the CAP mortality and the requirement for mechanical ventilation or ICU admission.However,whether statin use can reduce the risk of pneumonia remains unclear.
出处
《中国医学科学院学报》
CAS
CSCD
北大核心
2018年第1期30-40,共11页
Acta Academiae Medicinae Sinicae