期刊文献+

我国知识产权不公平贸易调查制度构建研究 被引量:2

Analysis of the Construction of Unfair Trade Investigation System of Intellectual Property Rights in China
原文传递
导出
摘要 随着知识产权在国际贸易中的参与度逐渐升高,知识产权不公平贸易调查制度成为促进对外贸易发展,弥补司法保护不足,应对逆全球化的重要手段和途径。知识产权不公平贸易调查制度早已具有国外实践探路。从美国、日本、韩国知识产权不公平贸易调查制度的构建及发展来看,一方面,在制度构建时应当注重协调不公平贸易调查制度与司法保护、海关保护及国际贸易规则的关系,另一方面,还应当调整《对外贸易法》及《知识产权海关保护条例》的规定,完善知识产权不公平贸易的制度基础,在此基础上进一步细化程序规定。 With the increasing participation of intellectual property rights in international trade, the unfair trade investigation system of intellectual property rights has become an important way of promoting the development of foreign trade, making up for the lack of judicial protection and coping with de- globalization. The unfair trade investigation system of intellectual property rights has been established for a long time in the United States, Japan and South Korea. When it comes to construct this system in our country, on one hand, we should coordinate the unfair trade investigation system with judicial protection, customs protection and international trade rules. On the other hand, the regulations of Foreign Trade Law of the P. R. China and Regulation of the P. R. China on the Customs Protection of IP Rights should be adjusted to improve the institutional basis of the unfair trade of intellectual property rights.
作者 鲁甜 LU Tian
出处 《国际经贸探索》 CSSCI 北大核心 2018年第2期99-112,共14页 International Economics and Trade Research
基金 国家社科基金一般项目(17BFX207) 教育部人文社科重点研究基地重大项目(17JJD820014)
关键词 知识产权 公平贸易 贸易调查 海关保护 司法保护 国际贸易 intellectual property fair trade trade investigation customs protection judicialprotection international trade
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献72

  • 1杨国华.G8峰会再议知识产权保护[J].WTO经济导刊,2007(7):93-93. 被引量:3
  • 2Awokuse ,T. O. , and Hong Yin. 2010. "Does Stronger Intellectual Property Rights Protection Induce More Bilateral Trade? " World Development ,38 ( 8 ) : 1094 - 1104.
  • 3Branstette, L. G. , R. Fisman, and F. Foley. 2006. " Do Stronger Intellectual Property Rights Increase International Technology Transfer? Empirical Evidence from U. S. Firm -Level Panel Data. "The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 121 (1) : 321 -349.
  • 4Chin, J. C. , and G. M. Grossman. 1990. " Intellectual Property Rights and North - South Trade. " In The Political Economy of International Trade: Essays in Honor of Robert E. Baldwin, ed. W. J. Ronald and Anne O. Krueger, 90 - 107. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
  • 5Co, C. C. 2004. "Do Patent Rights Regimes Matter?" Review of International Economics, 12 ( 3 ) : 359 - 373.
  • 6Diwan, I. , and D. Rodrik. 1991. "Patents, Appropriate Technology, and North - South Trade. "Journal of International Economics, 30(1 -2) :27 -47.
  • 7Dunning, J. H. 1981. International Production and the Multinational Enterprise London:Allen Unwin.
  • 8Falvey, R. , N. Foster. , and D. Greenaway. 2009. "Trade, Imitative Ability and Intellectual Property Rights. " Review of World Economics ( Weltwirtschafiliches Archiv) , 145 ( 3 ) : 373 - 404.
  • 9Foster, hi. 2012. " Intellectual Property Rights and the Margins of International Trade. " The Journal of International Trade and Economic Development ,3 ( 1 ) : 1 - 30.
  • 10Ferrantino, M. J. 1993. "The Effect of Intellectual Property Rights on International Trade and Investment. " Review of World Economics, 129 ( 2 ) : 300 - 331.

共引文献34

同被引文献48

引证文献2

二级引证文献15

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部