摘要
学界关于法条竞合争议点在于法条竞合中当特别法不能使犯罪得到合理评价的情况下,能否适用重法以罚当其罪。再者,犯罪行为在不符合特别法的入罪数额标准的情况下,能否递补适用普通法避免遗漏评价。从罪刑相适应原则出发,适用重法能够使得犯罪行为得以合理评价,另外适用重法并不违反罪刑法定原则。同时要脱离"立法者的特别考量"的窠臼,且法条竞合的基础条件并不存在,可以适用普通法进行完整评价。
Scholars on the concurrence issue is the overlap of criminal law when the special law cannot make a reasonable evaluation of the criminal case,can apply to law of proportionality. Furthermore,if the crime does not conform to the standard of the amount of crime in the special law,can the common law be applied to avoid omission evaluation. In accordance with the principle of adaptation to crime and punishment,the application of heavy law can make criminal behavior be evaluated rationally,and the application of heavy law does not violate the principle of legally prescribed punishment for a specified crime. At the same time from the"special consideration"legislators stereotype,and the basic conditions of articles of law does not exist,can be applied to the common law of integrity evaluation.
基金
2013年国家社科基金项目"我国量刑改革的反思和调整问题研究"(项目编号:13CFX044)
关键词
特别关系
竞合形式
特别法优先
重法优先
special relation
the overlap of criminal law
priority of special law
priority of strict law