期刊文献+

中国农产品质量安全现状与技术发展趋势 被引量:18

Progress and Trend on Technique of Agro-products Quality and Safety in China
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本文回顾了中国农产品质量安全发展历程,总结了中国在标准化体系、检测监测技术水平、全程监管能力、责任落实等方面取得的成效;分析了当前中国农产品质量安全面临的形势,并针对当前中国农产品质量安全产业存在的问题及面临的机遇挑战,探讨评述了农产品质量安全共性技术发展的趋势。 This paper reviews the development history of agro-products quality and safety in China. Theachievements of standardization system, monitoring technology, whole process supervision ability and theresponsibility implementation were summarized. And the current situation of the agro-products quality andsafety in China is analyzed. In view of the current problems and challenges of the agro-products quality andsafety industry in China, the development trend of the science and technology of agro-product quality andsafety were discussed and emulated.
出处 《农学学报》 2018年第1期211-214,共4页 Journal of Agriculture
关键词 农产品质量安全 形势 技术发展 趋势 Agro-product Quality and Safety Situation Technology Development Trend
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献78

  • 1吴永宁,周乃元,陈君石.十五国家重大科技专项“食品安全关键技术”[J].中国食品卫生杂志,2007,19(2):97-101. 被引量:13
  • 2Wu Y N, Chen Y. Editorial: Food safety in China. J Epidemiol Community Health, 2013, 67:478-479.
  • 3FAO. Food Safety Risk Analysis, A Guide for National Food Safety Authorities (FAO Food and Nutrition Paper 87). Roma: FAO, 2006.
  • 4Abt E, Rodricks J, Levy J, et al. Science and decisions: Advancing risk assessment. Risk Anal 2010, 30:1028-1036.
  • 5Slob W, Pieters M N. A probabilistic approach for deriving acceptable human intake limits and human health risks from toxicological studies: General framework. Risk Anal, 1998, 18:787-798.
  • 6Allen B C, Kavlock R J, Kimmel C A, et al. Dose-response assessment for developmental toxicity II. Comparison of generic benchmark dose estimates with no observed adverse effect levels. Fundam Appl Toxicol, 1994, 23:487-495.
  • 7Barnes D, Dourson M. Reference dose (RfD): Description and use in health risk assessments. Regul Pharmacol Toxicol, 1988, 8:471486.
  • 8Bokkers B G H, Bakker M I Boon P E, et al. The practicability of the integrated probabilistic risk assessment (IPRA) approach for sub- stances in food. In RIVM rapport 320121001. 2009. http://www.rivm.nl/bibliotheek/rapporten/320121001.html.
  • 9European Food Safety Authority (EFSA). Guidance of the Scientific Committee on a request from EFSA on the use of the benchmark dose approach in risk assessment. EFSA J, 2009, 1150:1-72.
  • 10International Programm on Chemical Safety (IPCS). Environmental Health Criteria 240: Principles and Methods for the Risk Assessment of Chemicals in Food. Geneva: WHO, 2009.

共引文献169

同被引文献184

引证文献18

二级引证文献58

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部